Causes of Death in U.S. Special Operations Forces in the Global War on Terrorism

John B. Holcomb(United States Army Institute of Surgical Research), Neil R. McMullin(United States Army Institute of Surgical Research), Lisa Pearse(Armed Forces Medical College), Jim Caruso(Armed Forces Medical College), Charles E. Wade(United States Army Institute of Surgical Research), Lynne Oetjen-Gerdes(Armed Forces Medical College), Howard R. Champion(Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences), Mimi Lawnick(United States Army), Warner D. Farr(United States Department of the Army), Sam Rodriguez(United States Army), Frank K. Butler(United States Air Force Academy)
Annals of Surgery
May 21, 2007
Cited by 687Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

In Brief Background: Effective combat trauma management strategies depend upon an understanding of the epidemiology of death on the battlefield. Methods: A panel of military medical experts reviewed photographs and autopsy and treatment records for all Special Operations Forces (SOF) who died between October 2001 and November 2004 (n = 82). Fatal wounds were classified as nonsurvivable or potentially survivable. Training and equipment available at the time of injury were taken into consideration. A structured analysis was conducted to identify equipment, training, or research requirements for improved future outcomes. Results: Five (6%) of 82 casualties had died in an aircraft crash, and their bodies were lost at sea; autopsies had been performed on all other 77 soldiers. Nineteen deaths, including the deaths at sea were noncombat; all others were combat related. Deaths were caused by explosions (43%), gunshot wounds (28%), aircraft accidents (23%), and blunt trauma (6%). Seventy of 82 deaths (85%) were classified as nonsurvivable; 12 deaths (15%) were classified as potentially survivable. Of those with potentially survivable injuries, 16 causes of death were identified: 8 (50%) truncal hemorrhage, 3 (19%) compressible hemorrhage, 2 (13%) hemorrhage amenable to tourniquet, and 1 (6%) each from tension pneumothorax, airway obstruction, and sepsis. The population with nonsurvivable injuries was more severely injured than the population with potentially survivable injuries. Structured analysis identified improved methods of truncal hemorrhage control as a principal research requirement. Conclusions: The majority of deaths on the modern battlefield are nonsurvivable. Improved methods of intravenous or intracavitary, noncompressible hemostasis combined with rapid evacuation to surgery may increase survival. Effective combat trauma management strategies depend on an understanding of the epidemiology of death on the battlefield. A review of photographs and autopsy and treatment records of 82 combat deaths classified the majority as nonsurvivable. Twelve (15%) deaths identified as potentially survivable led us to conclude that improved methods of intravenous or intracavitary, noncompressible hemostasis, and rapid evacuation may increase survival.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis