The impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on outcome in 2853 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML

Sabine Käyser(University Hospital Ulm), Konstanze Döhner(University Hospital Ulm), Jürgen Krauter(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Claus‐Henning Köhne(Klinikum Oldenburg), Heinz A. Horst(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Gerhard Held(Saarland University), Marie von Lilienfeld‐Toal(University Hospital Bonn), Sibylla Wilhelm(Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe), Andrea Kündgen(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Katharina S. Götze(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Mathias Rummel(Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg), David Nachbaur(University Hospital Innsbruck), Brigitte Schlegelberger(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Gudrun Göhring(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Daniela Späth(University Hospital Ulm), Carina Morlok(University Hospital Ulm), Manuela Zucknick(German Cancer Research Center), Arnold Ganser(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Hartmut Döhner(University Hospital Ulm), Richard F. Schlenk(University Hospital Ulm), for the German-Austrian AMLSG
Blood
December 3, 2010
Cited by 483

Abstract

To study the characteristics and clinical impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). 200 patients (7.0%) had t-AML and 2653 de novo AML (93%). Patients with t-AML were older (P < .0001) and they had lower white blood counts (P = .003) compared with de novo AML patients; t-AML patients had abnormal cytogenetics more frequently, with overrepresentation of 11q23 translocations as well as adverse cytogenetics, including complex and monosomal karyotypes, and with underrepresentation of intermediate-risk karyotypes (P < .0001); t-AML patients had NPM1 mutations (P < .0001) and FLT3 internal tandem duplications (P = .0005) less frequently. Younger age at diagnosis of primary malignancy and treatment with intercalating agents as well as topoisomerase II inhibitors were associated with shorter latency periods to the occurrence of t-AML. In multivariable analyses, t-AML was an adverse prognostic factor for death in complete remission but not relapse in younger intensively treated patients (P < .0001 and P = .39, respectively), relapse but not death in complete remission in older, less intensively treated patients (P = .02 and P = .22, respectively) and overall survival in younger intensively treated patients (P = .01). In more intensively treated younger adults, treatment-related toxicity had a major negative impact on outcome, possibly reflecting cumulative toxicity of cancer treatment.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis