The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Report of the Subcommittee on Management and Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Gerd Geerling(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Joseph Tauber(Tauber Eye Center), Christophe Baudouin(Université Paris Cité), Eiki Goto(Tsurumi University), Yukihiro Matsumoto(Keio University), Terrence P. O’Brien(Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center), Maurizio Rolando(University of Genoa), Kazuo Tsubota(Keio University), Kelly K. Nichols
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
March 30, 2011
Cited by 614Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The goals of the subcommittee were to review the current practice and published evidence of medical and surgical treatment options for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and to identify areas with conflicting, or lack of, evidence, observations, concepts, or even mechanisms where further research is required. To achieve these goals, a comprehensive review of clinical textbooks and the scientific literature was performed and the quality of published evidence graded according to an agreed on standard, using objective criteria for clinical and basic research studies adapted from the American Academy of Ophthalmology Practice Guidelines1 (Table 1). It should be noted that, in many of the clinical textbooks and previous reports, terminology is often interchanged and the management of anterior and posterior blepharitis and/or meibomitis is often considered concurrently. Thus, a broad scope of documents was reviewed in this process. Consistency in terminology and global adoption of the term “meibomian gland dysfunction” would significantly aid clinical research and clinical care in MGD going forward. Table 1. Grading Level of Evidence of Clinical and Basic Research Studies1


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis