Randomized Phase Ib/II Trial of Rilotumumab or Ganitumab with Panitumumab versus Panitumumab Alone in Patients with Wild-type <i>KRAS</i> Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Eric Van Cutsem(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Cathy Eng(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Elżbieta Nowara, Anna Świeboda-Sadlej(Medical University of Warsaw), Niall C. Tebbutt(Austin Health), Edith P. Mitchell(Thomas Jefferson University), Ірина Давиденко(Krasnodar Research Institute of Storage and Processing of Agricultural Products), Joe Stephenson(Neurology Centers of the Carolinas), Elena Élez(Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Hans Prenen(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Hongjie Deng(Amgen (United States)), Rui Tang(Amgen (United States)), Ian McCaffery(Amgen (United States)), Kelly S. Oliner(Amgen (United States)), Lisa Chen(Amgen (United States)), Jennifer Gansert(Amgen (United States)), Elwyn Loh(Amgen (United States)), Dominic Smethurst(Amgen (United Kingdom)), Josep Tabernero(Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Clinical Cancer Research
June 12, 2014
Cited by 109Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), has demonstrated efficacy in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Rilotumumab and ganitumab are investigational, fully human mAbs against hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/scatter factor and IGF1R, respectively. Here we evaluate combining rilotumumab or ganitumab with panitumumab in previously treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Part 1 was a phase Ib dose-finding study of panitumumab plus rilotumumab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Part 2 was a randomized phase II trial of panitumumab in combination with rilotumumab, ganitumab, or placebo. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Archival tissue specimens were collected for exploratory correlative work. RESULTS: In part 1, no DLTs were reported. A recommended phase II dose of 10 mg/kg rilotumumab was selected. In part 2, for the panitumumab plus rilotumumab (n = 48), panitumumab plus ganitumab (n = 46), and panitumumab plus placebo arms (n = 48), the ORRs were 31%, 22%, and 21%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.2, 5.3, and 3.7 months and median OS 13.8, 10.6, and 11.6 months, respectively. Adverse events were tolerable. Exploratory biomarker analyses, including MET and IGF-related protein expression, failed to indicate conclusive predictive evidence on efficacy endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Panitumumab plus rilotumumab met the prespecified criterion for improvement in ORR whereas ganitumab did not. This is the first study to suggest a benefit for combining an HGF inhibitor (rilotumumab) with panitumumab in previously treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis