Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

A. Keith Stewart(Apple (Israel)), S. Vincent Rajkumar(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Meletios Α. Dimopoulos(Alexandra Hospital), Tamás Masszi(Semmelweis University), Ivan Špıčka, Albert Oriol(Institut Català d'Oncologia), Roman Hájek(University of Ostrava), Laura Rosiñol(Hospital Clínic de Barcelona), David S. Siegel(Hackensack University Medical Center), Georgi Mihaylov(Queen Giovanna Hospital), Vesselina Goranova‐Marinova, Péter Rajnics(Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Oktató Kórház), Aleksandr Suvorov(The First Republican Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Health of the Udmurt Republic), Rubén Niesvizky(Cornell University), Andrzej Jakubowiak(University of Chicago), Jesús F. San Miguel(Clinica Universidad de Navarra), Heinz Ludwig(Wilhelminen Hospital), Michael Wang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Vladimír Maisnar(Charles University), Jiří Minařík(University Hospital Olomouc), William Bensinger(Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa), María-Victoria Mateos(Complejo Hospitalario de Salamanca), Dina Ben‐Yehuda(Hadassah Medical Center), Vishal Kukreti(Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Naseem J. Zojwalla, Margaret Tonda, Xinqun Yang, Biao Xing, Philippe Moreau(Nantes Université), Antonio Palumbo(University of Turin)
New England Journal of Medicine
December 6, 2014
Cited by 1,320Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is a reference treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma. The combination of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone has shown efficacy in a phase 1 and 2 study in relapsed multiple myeloma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 792 patients with relapsed multiple myeloma to carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Progression-free survival was significantly improved with carfilzomib (median, 26.3 months, vs. 17.6 months in the control group; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.83; P=0.0001). The median overall survival was not reached in either group at the interim analysis. The Kaplan-Meier 24-month overall survival rates were 73.3% and 65.0% in the carfilzomib and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99; P=0.04). The rates of overall response (partial response or better) were 87.1% and 66.7% in the carfilzomib and control groups, respectively (P<0.001; 31.8% and 9.3% of patients in the respective groups had a complete response or better; 14.1% and 4.3% had a stringent complete response). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 83.7% and 80.7% of patients in the carfilzomib and control groups, respectively; 15.3% and 17.7% of patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events. Patients in the carfilzomib group reported superior health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, the addition of carfilzomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone resulted in significantly improved progression-free survival at the interim analysis and had a favorable risk-benefit profile. (Funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01080391.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis