Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations

Susan M. Wolf(University of Minnesota), Frances Lawrenz(University of Minnesota), Charles A. Nelson(Harvard University Press), Jeffrey Kahn(University of Minnesota), Mildred K. Cho(Stanford University), Ellen Wright Clayton(Vanderbilt University), Joel G. Fletcher(WinnMed), Michael Georgieff(University of Minnesota), Dale E. Hammerschmidt(University of Minnesota), Kathy Hudson(Johns Hopkins University), Judy Illes(University of British Columbia), Vivek Kapur(Pennsylvania State University), Moira A. Keane(University of Minnesota), Barbara A. Koenig, Bonnie S. LeRoy(University of Minnesota), Elizabeth G. McFarland(University of Washington), Jordan Paradise(University of Minnesota), Lisa S. Parker(University of Pittsburgh), Sharon F. Terry(Genetic Alliance), Brian G. Van Ness(University of Minnesota), Benjamin S. Wilfond(University of Washington)
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
January 1, 2008
Cited by 700Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

No consensus yet exists on how to handle incidental findings (IFs) in human subjects research. Yet empirical studies document IFs in a wide range of research studies, where IFs are findings beyond the aims of the study that are of potential health or reproductive importance to the individual research participant. This paper reports recommendations of a two-year project group funded by NIH to study how to manage IFs in genetic and genomic research, as well as imaging research. We conclude that researchers have an obligation to address the possibility of discovering IFs in their protocol and communications with the IRB, and in their consent forms and communications with research participants. Researchers should establish a pathway for handling IFs and communicate that to the IRB and research participants. We recommend a pathway and categorize IFs into those that must be disclosed to research participants, those that may be disclosed, and those that should not be disclosed.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis