Incidence, characterization and prognostic significance of chromosomal abnormalities in 640 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes

Françesc Solé(Hospital de l'Esperança), Blanca Espinet(Hospital de l'Esperança), Guillermo Sanz(Hospital de l'Esperança), Cervera Cervera(Universidad de La Laguna), Marı́a José Calasanz(Universidad de La Laguna), Luño(Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias), Prieto(Leitat Technological Center), Isabel Granada(Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol), Hernández(Complejo Hospitalario de Salamanca), Cigudosa(Universidad de La Laguna), Díez(Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda), Bureo(Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital), Marquès(Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre), Arranz(Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz), Ríos(Hospital Comarcal de Inca), José A. Martinez‐Climent(Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Vallespí(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Lourdes Florensa(Hospital de l'Esperança), Woessner(Hospital de l'Esperança)
British Journal of Haematology
February 1, 2000
Cited by 267

Abstract

Recently, a consensus International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for predicting outcome and planning therapy in the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been developed. However, the intermediate-risk cytogenetic subgroup defined by the IPSS includes a miscellaneous number of different single abnormalities for which real prognosis at present is uncertain. The main aims of this study were to evaluate in an independent series the prognostic value of the IPSS and to identify chromosomal abnormalities with a previously unrecognized good or poor prognosis in 640 patients. In univariate analyses, cases with single 1q abnormalities experienced poor survival, whereas those with trisomy 8 had a higher risk of acute leukaemic transformation than the remaining patients (P = 0.004 and P = 0.009 respectively). Patients with single del(12p) had a similar survival to patients with a normal karyotype and showed some trend for a better survival than other cases belonging to the IPSS intermediate-risk cytogenetic subgroup (P = 0.045). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that IPSS cytogenetic prognostic subgroup, proportion of bone marrow blasts and haemoglobin level were the main prognostic factors for survival, and the first two characteristics and platelet count were the best predictors of acute leukaemic transformation risk. A large international co-operative study should be carried out to clarify these findings.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis