CHARITÉ Versus ProDisc
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A retrospective study. Objectives. To evaluate and compare clinical and radiologic outcomes of the CHARITÉ and ProDisc. Summary of Background Data. There is no clinical report comparing CHARITÉ and ProDisc. Methods. Among a total of 61 patients who underwent total disc replacement, 57 patients followed more than 3 years were enrolled. The CHARITÉ was used in 33 patients and ProDisc in 24. MRI follow-up was possible in 52 patients. Clinical and radiologic data including range of motion (ROM) and facet degeneration of the replaced segment, and degeneration of the disc at the adjacent level were evaluated. Results. Mean percentage improvement of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was 78.9% in the CHARITÉ group and 75.8% in ProDisc group. The mean improvement of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score was 72% in the CHARITÉ and 74.2% in ProDisc. There was no statistical difference between 2 groups in improvement rates either of the ODI scores and VAS scores. Degradation of the facets was seen in 36.4% of the CHARITÉ and 32% of the ProDisc. Degradation of disc degeneration at the adjacent level above the index level was seen in 19.4% in the CHARITÉ and 28.6% in the ProDisc. The degradation rates of facet joints and disc at adjacent segment between the 2 groups were not significantly different. Segmental ROM of the replaced segments was well preserved, but ROM of L5–S1 of the ProDisc was significantly less than that of the CHARITÉ. Conclusions. While clinical outcomes of both CHARITÉ and ProDisc groups were fairly good, the facet joint of the index level and the disc at the adjacent level showed an aggravation of the degenerative process in a significant number of patients, regardless of the device used, raising concerns of possible late consequences of total disc replacement, especially regarding facet arthrosis and adjacent segment disease. A retrospective analysis was conducted to identify differences in clinical and radiologic outcomes between the CHARITÉ and ProDisc disc prostheses. Both devices were effective in relieving back pain and disability of the patients, but high incidences of facet degeneration of the level of replacement and disc degeneration at the adjacent segment were identified.
Related Papers
No related papers found
Powered by citation graph analysis