A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse

W.K. Alfred Yung(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Robert E. Albright, Jeffrey J. Olson(Emory University), Ruth K. Fredericks(University of Mississippi), Karen Fink(The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), Michael D. Prados(University of California, San Francisco), M. Brada(Institute of Cancer Research), A. Spence(University of Washington), Raymond J. Hohl(University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics), William Shapiro(Barrow Neurological Institute), Michael Glantz(Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island), H. S. Greenberg(University of Michigan), Robert G. Selker(Center for Neuro-Oncology), Nicholas A. Vick(NorthShore University HealthSystem), R. Rampling(Western Infirmary), Henry S. Friedman(Duke University), Peter C. Phillips∥(University of Pennsylvania), Janet Bruner(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), N C Yue(St. Joseph Medical Center), David Osoba(BC Cancer Agency), Sara Zaknoen(Merck (Japan)), Victor A. Levin(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
British Journal of Cancer
September 1, 2000
Cited by 937Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

A randomized, multicentre, open-label, phase II study compared temozolomide (TMZ), an oral second-generation alkylating agent, and procarbazine (PCB) in 225 patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Primary objectives were to determine progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and safety for TMZ and PCB in adult patients who failed conventional treatment. Secondary objectives were to assess overall survival and health-related quality of life (HRQL). TMZ was given orally at 200 mg/m(2)/day or 150 mg/m(2)/day (prior chemotherapy) for 5 days, repeated every 28 days. PCB was given orally at 150 mg/m(2)/day or 125 mg/m(2)/day (prior chemotherapy) for 28 days, repeated every 56 days. HRQL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 [+3]) and the Brain Cancer Module 20 (BCM20). The 6-month PFS rate for patients who received TMZ was 21%, which met the protocol objective. The 6-month PFS rate for those who received PCB was 8% (P = 0.008, for the comparison). Overall PFS significantly improved with TMZ, with a median PFS of 12.4 weeks in the TMZ group and 8.32 weeks in the PCB group (P = 0.0063). The 6-month overall survival rate for TMZ patients was 60% vs. 44% for PCB patients (P = 0.019). Freedom from disease progression was associated with maintenance of HRQL, regardless of treatment received. TMZ had an acceptable safety profile; most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis