A Case for Clarity, Consistency, and Helpfulness: State-of-the-Art Clinical Practice Guidelines in Endocrinology Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System

Brian A. Swiglo(Mayo Clinic), M. Hassan Murad(Mayo Clinic), Holger J. Schünemann(McMaster University), Regina Kunz(University Hospital of Basel), Robert A. Vigersky(Walter Reed Army Institute of Research), Gordon Guyatt(McMaster University), Víctor M. Montori(Mayo Clinic)
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
January 3, 2008
Cited by 297Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The Endocrine Society, and a growing number of other organizations, have adopted the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to develop clinical practice guidelines and grade the strength of recommendations and the quality of the evidence. Despite the use of GRADE in several of The Endocrine Society's clinical practice guidelines, endocrinologists have not had access to a context-specific discussion of this system and its merits.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis