Prevalence, Characteristics, and Publication of Discontinued Randomized Trials

Benjamin Kasenda(University Hospital of Basel), Erik von Elm(Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine), John J. You(McMaster University), Anette Blümle(University Medical Center Freiburg), Yuki Tomonaga(University of Zurich), Ramon Saccilotto(University Hospital of Basel), Alain Amstutz(University Hospital of Basel), Theresa Bengough(Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine), Joerg J Meerpohl(University Medical Center Freiburg), Mihaela Stegert(University Hospital of Basel), Kari A.O. Tikkinen(University of Helsinki), Ignacio Neumann(Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Alonso Carrasco‐Labra(University of Chile), Markus Faulhaber(McMaster University), Sohail Mulla(McMaster University), Dominik Mertz(McMaster University), Elie A. Akl(American University), Dirk Bassler(University Children's Hospital Tübingen), Jason W. Busse(McMaster University), Ignacio Ferreira‐González(Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública), François Lamontagne(Université de Sherbrooke), Alain Nordmann(University Hospital of Basel), Viktoria Gloy(University Hospital of Bern), Heike Raatz(University Hospital of Basel), Lorenzo Moja(Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi), Rachel Rosenthal(University Hospital of Basel), Shanil Ebrahim(Stanford University), Stefan Schandelmaier(University Hospital of Basel), Sun Xin(Sichuan University), Per Olav Vandvik(Innlandet Hospital Trust), Bradley C. Johnston(University of Toronto), Martin A. Walter(University Hospital of Bern), Bernard Burnand(Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine), Matthias Schwenkglenks(University of Zurich), Lars G. Hemkens(University Hospital of Basel), Heiner C. Bucher(University Hospital of Basel), Gordon Guyatt(McMaster University), Matthias Briel(University Hospital of Basel)
JAMA
March 11, 2014
Cited by 422Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The discontinuation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) raises ethical concerns and often wastes scarce research resources. The epidemiology of discontinued RCTs, however, remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence, characteristics, and publication history of discontinued RCTs and to investigate factors associated with RCT discontinuation due to poor recruitment and with nonpublication. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort of RCTs based on archived protocols approved by 6 research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. We recorded trial characteristics and planned recruitment from included protocols. Last follow-up of RCTs was April 27, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Completion status, reported reasons for discontinuation, and publication status of RCTs as determined by correspondence with the research ethics committees, literature searches, and investigator surveys. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.6 years (range, 8.8-12.6 years), 253 of 1017 included RCTs were discontinued (24.9% [95% CI, 22.3%-27.6%]). Only 96 of 253 discontinuations (37.9% [95% CI, 32.0%-44.3%]) were reported to ethics committees. The most frequent reason for discontinuation was poor recruitment (101/1017; 9.9% [95% CI, 8.2%-12.0%]). In multivariable analysis, industry sponsorship vs investigator sponsorship (8.4% vs 26.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.15-0.43]; P < .001) and a larger planned sample size in increments of 100 (-0.7%; OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-1.00]; P = .04) were associated with lower rates of discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Discontinued trials were more likely to remain unpublished than completed trials (55.1% vs 33.6%; OR, 3.19 [95% CI, 2.29-4.43]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this sample of trials based on RCT protocols from 6 research ethics committees, discontinuation was common, with poor recruitment being the most frequently reported reason. Greater efforts are needed to ensure the reporting of trial discontinuation to research ethics committees and the publication of results of discontinued trials.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis