Association of KRAS p.G13D Mutation With Outcome in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab

Wendy De Roock(KU Leuven), Derek J. Jonker(Ottawa Hospital Research Institute), Federica Di Nicolantonio(University of Turin), Andrea Sartore‐Bianchi(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), Dongsheng Tu(Ontario Institute for Cancer Research), Salvatore Siena(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), Simona Lamba(University of Turin), Sabrina Arena(University of Turin), Milo Frattini(University of Bern), Hubert Piessevaux(Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc), Eric Van Cutsem(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Chris J. O’Callaghan(Ontario Institute for Cancer Research), Shirin Khambata‐Ford(Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany)), John Zalcberg(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), John Simes(University of Sydney), Christos S. Karapetis(Flinders University), Alberto Bardelli(University of Turin), Sabine Tejpar(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven)
JAMA
October 26, 2010
Cited by 747

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have KRAS codon 12- or KRAS codon 13-mutated tumors are presently excluded from treatment with the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that KRAS codon 13 mutations are associated with a better outcome after treatment with cetuximab than observed with other KRAS mutations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We studied the association between KRAS mutation status (p.G13D vs other KRAS mutations) and response and survival in a pooled data set of 579 patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab between 2001 and 2008. Patients were included in the CO.17, BOND, MABEL, EMR202600, EVEREST, BABEL, or SALVAGE clinical trials or received off-study treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses, adjusting for possible prognostic factors and data set, were performed. The effect of the different mutations was studied in vitro by constructing isogenic cell lines with wild-type KRAS, p.G12V, or p.G13D mutant alleles and treating them with cetuximab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main efficacy end point was overall survival. Secondary efficacy end points were response rate and progression-free survival. RESULTS: In comparison with patients with other KRAS-mutated tumors, patients with p.G13D-mutated tumors (n = 32) treated with cetuximab had longer overall survival (median, 7.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.7-20.5] months vs 5.7 [95% CI, 4.9-6.8] months; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81; P = .005) and longer progression-free survival (median, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.9-6.2] months vs 1.9 [95% CI, 1.8-2.8] months; adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81; P = .004). There was a significant interaction between KRAS mutation status (p.G13D vs other KRAS mutations) and overall survival benefit with cetuximab treatment (adjusted HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.67; P = .003). In vitro and mouse model analysis showed that although p.G12V-mutated colorectal cells were insensitive to cetuximab, p.G13D-mutated cells were sensitive, as were KRAS wild-type cells. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, use of cetuximab was associated with longer overall and progression-free survival among patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer with p.G13D-mutated tumors than with other KRAS-mutated tumors. Evaluation of cetuximab therapy in these tumors in prospective randomized trials may be warranted.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis