Comparative single-institute analysis of cord blood transplantation from unrelated donors with bone marrow or peripheral blood stem-cell transplants from related donors in adult patients with hematologic malignancies after myeloablative conditioning regimen

Satoshi Takahashi(The University of Tokyo), Jun Ooi(The University of Tokyo), Akira Tomonari(The University of Tokyo), Takaaki Konuma(The University of Tokyo), Nobuhiro Tsukada(The University of Tokyo), Maki Oiwa‐Monna(The University of Tokyo), Kenji Fukuno(The University of Tokyo), Michihiro Uchiyama(The University of Tokyo), Kashiya Takasugi(The University of Tokyo), Tohru Iseki(The University of Tokyo), Arinobu Tojo(The University of Tokyo), Takuhiro Yamaguchi(University of Tokyo Health Sciences), Shigetaka Asano(Waseda University)
Blood
October 12, 2006
Cited by 298Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

We studied the clinical outcomes of 171 adults with hematologic malignancies who received unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) as a primary unrelated stem-cell source (n=100), or bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem-cell transplant (PBSCT) from related donors (n=71, 55 BMT and 16 PBSCT). All patients received myeloablative regimens including 12 Gy total body irradiation. We analyzed the hematologic recovery, and risks of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplantation-related mortality (TRM) and relapse, and disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Significant delays in engraftment occurred after cord blood transplantation; however, overall engraftment rates were almost the same for both grafts. The cumulative incidences of grades III to IV acute and extensive-type chronic GVHDs among CBT recipients were significantly lower than those among BMT/PBSCT recipients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no apparent differences in TRM (9% in CBT and 13% in BMT/PBSCT recipients), relapse (17% in CBT and 26% in BMT/PBSCT recipients), and DFS (70% in CBT and 60% in BMT/PBSCT recipients) between both groups. These data suggest that unrelated cord blood could be as safe and effective a stem-cell source as related bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood for adult patients when it is used as a primary unrelated stem-cell source.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis