Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Josep M. Llovet(Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Sergio Ricci(University of Pisa), Vincenzo Mazzaferro(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Philip Hilgard(University of Duisburg-Essen), Edward Gane(Auckland City Hospital), Jean Frédéric Blanc(Hôpital Saint-André), André Cosme de Oliveira(Universidade de São Paulo), Armando Santoro(Fondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca), Jean‐Luc Raoul(EU Business School, Geneva), Alejandro Forner(Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red), Myron Schwartz(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Camillo Porta(Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione), Stefan Zeuzem(Goethe University Frankfurt), Luigi Bolondi(University of Bologna), Tim F. Greten(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Peter R. Galle(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Jean François Seitz(Aix-Marseille Université), Ivan Borbath(UCLouvain), Dieter Häussinger(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Tom Giannaris, Minghua Shan(Bayer (United States)), M. Moscovici, D. Voliotis, Jordi Bruix(Universitat de Barcelona)
New England Journal of Medicine
July 23, 2008
Cited by 12,928Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No effective systemic therapy exists for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A preliminary study suggested that sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Raf may be effective in hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In this multicenter, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic treatment to receive either sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary outcomes were overall survival and the time to symptomatic progression. Secondary outcomes included the time to radiologic progression and safety. RESULTS: At the second planned interim analysis, 321 deaths had occurred, and the study was stopped. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in the sorafenib group and 7.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the median time to symptomatic progression (4.1 months vs. 4.9 months, respectively, P=0.77). The median time to radiologic progression was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the sorafenib group (2%) and two patients in the placebo group (1%) had a partial response; no patients had a complete response. Diarrhea, weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia were more frequent in the sorafenib group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00105443.)


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis