Long-Term Survival, Nutritional Autonomy, and Quality of Life After Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation

Kareem Abu‐Elmagd(University of Pittsburgh), Beverly Kosmach‐Park(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Guilherme Costa(University of Pittsburgh), Mazen Zenati(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Lillian Martin(University of Pittsburgh), Darlene Koritsky(University of Pittsburgh), Maureen Emerling(University of Pittsburgh), Noriko Murase(University of Pittsburgh), Geoffrey Bond(University of Pittsburgh), Kyle Soltys(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Hiroshi Sogawa(University of Pittsburgh), John G. Lunz(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Motaz Al Samman(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Nico Shaefer(University of Pittsburgh), Rakesh Sindhi(Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh), George Mazariegos(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)
Annals of Surgery
August 7, 2012
Cited by 207

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To assess long-term survival, graft function, and health-related quality of life (QOL) after visceral transplantation. Background: Despite continual improvement in early survival, the long-term therapeutic efficacy of visceral transplantation has yet to be defined. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 227 visceral allograft recipients who survived beyond the 5-year milestone. Clinical data were used to assess outcome including graft function and long-term survival predictors. The socioeconomic milestones and QOL measures were assessed by clinical evaluation, professional consultation, and validated QOL inventory. Results: Of 376 recipients, 227 survived beyond 5 years, with conditional survival of 75% at 10 years and 61% at 15 years. With a mean follow-up of 10 ± 4 years, 177 (92 adults, 85 children) are alive, with 118 (67%) recipients 18 years or older. Nonfunctional social support and noninclusion of the liver in the visceral allograft are the most significant survival risk factors. Nutritional autonomy was achievable in 160 (90%) survivors, with current serum albumin level of 3.7 ± 0.5 gm/dL and body mass index of 25 ± 6 kg/m2. Despite coexistence or development of neuropsychiatric disorders, most survivors were reintegrated to society with self-sustained socioeconomic status. In parallel, most of the psychological, emotional, and social QOL measures significantly (P < 0.05) improved after transplantation. Current morbidities with potential impact on global health included dysmotility (59%), hypertension (37%), osteoporosis (22%), and diabetes (11%), with significantly (P < 0.05) higher incidence among adult recipients. Conclusions: With new tactics to further improve long-term survival including social support measures, visceral transplantation has achieved excellent nutritional autonomy and good QOL. Three metrics were used to assess long-term therapeutic efficacy of visceral transplantation. With new tactics to further improve long-term survival including social support measures, the procedure has achieved excellent nutritional autonomy with good quality of life. Early consideration for gut rehabilitation with autologous bowel reconstructive or transplant surgery is recommended, particularly in the pediatric population, to reduce the risk of life-long neuropsychiatric disorders.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis