Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine <i>versus</i> povidone–iodine in clean-contaminated surgery

A Noorani(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Nicholas G Rabey(Broomfield Hospital), Stewart R. Walsh(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Justin Davies(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
British journal of surgery
September 28, 2010
Cited by 201Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infection increases morbidity, mortality and financial burden. The preferred topical antiseptic agent (chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine) for preoperative skin cleansing is unclear. METHODS: A meta-analysis of clinical trials was conducted to determine whether preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine reduced surgical-site infection in clean-contaminated surgery. RESULTS: The systematic review identified six eligible studies, containing 5031 patients. Chlorhexidine reduced postoperative surgical-site infection compared with povidone-iodine (pooled odds ratio 0.68, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.50 to 0.94; P = 0.019) . CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine should be used preferentially for preoperative antisepsis in clean-contaminated surgery.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis