Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines

Jan Brożek(Jagiellonian University), Elie A. Akl(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Pablo Alonso‐Coello(Hospital de Sant Pau), David M. Lang(Cleveland Clinic), Roman Jaeschke(McMaster University), John W Williams(Duke University), Bob Phillips(University of York), M. Lelgemann(University of Bremen), Anne Lethaby(University of Auckland), Jean Bousquet(Inserm), Gordon Guyatt(McMaster University), Holger J. Schünemann(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), for the GRADE Working Group
Allergy
February 7, 2009
Cited by 885

Abstract

The GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach provides guidance to grading the quality of underlying evidence and the strength of recommendations in health care. The GRADE system's conceptual underpinnings allow for a detailed stepwise process that defines what role the quality of the available evidence plays in the development of health care recommendations. The merit of GRADE is not that it eliminates judgments or disagreements about evidence and recommendations, but rather that it makes them transparent. This first article in a three-part series describes the GRADE framework in relation to grading the quality of evidence about interventions based on examples from the field of allergy and asthma. In the GRADE system, the quality of evidence reflects the extent to which a guideline panel's confidence in an estimate of the effect is adequate to support a particular recommendation. The system classifies quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low according to factors that include the study methodology, consistency and precision of the results, and directness of the evidence.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis