Virological and immunological effects of treatment interruptions in HIV-1 infected patients with treatment failure

Veronica Miller(Goethe University Frankfurt), Caroline Sabin(The Royal Free Hospital), Kurt Hertogs(Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom)), Stuart Bloor, Javier Martínez‐Picado(Harvard University Press), Richard T. D’Aquila(Harvard University Press), Brendan Larder, Thomas A. Lutz(Goethe University Frankfurt), Peter Gute(Goethe University Frankfurt), Eckhart Weidmann(Goethe University Frankfurt), Holger F. Rabenau(Goethe University Frankfurt), Andrew Phillips(University College London), Schlomo Staszewski(Goethe University Frankfurt)
Cited by 225

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the immunological and virological effects of treatment interruptions in HIV-1-infected patients with treatment failure and multidrug-resistant virus. METHODS: Drug susceptibility was assessed using Antivirogram and genotypic analysis was based on population and clonal sequencing for 48 patients who had interrupted treatment (> or = 2 months). RESULTS: Treatment interruption resulted in viral load increases (mean 0.7 log 10 copies/ ml; P = 0.0001) and CD4 cell count decreases (mean 89 x 10(6) cells/l; P = 0.0001). A complete shift to wild-type virus at the phenotypic, genotypic and clonal level was observed in 28/45 patients. These patients differed from those that did not show a shift to wild type in baseline CD4 cell counts (192 versus 59 x 10(6) cells/l; P= 0.007) and in the relationship between baseline viral load and CD4 cell count (no correlation versus a significant negative correlation; P= 0.008). Response to re-initiation of treatment fell with increasing viral load [relative hazard (RH) 0.33; P= 0.001] and with increasing total number of drugs with reduced susceptibility (RH 0.51; P = 0.0003); it improved with the number of new drugs received (RH 2.12; P = 0.0002) and a shift to wild type (RH 5.22, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in surrogate markers suggest that treatment provided benefit in spite of virological failure and resistant virus. Although patients with a shift to wildtype virus responded better in the short term to treatment re-initiation, the long-term effects are not known and the risk of immune deterioration needs to be carefully considered.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis