Anti-gp210 and anti-centromere antibodies are different risk factors for the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis

Minoru Nakamura(GTx (United States)), Hisayoshi Kondo(Nagasaki University), Tsuyoshi Mori(Nagasaki Medical Center), Atsumasa Komori(Nagasaki Medical Center), Mutsumi Matsuyama(Nagasaki University), Masahiro Ito(Nagasaki Medical Center), Yasushi Takii(Nagasaki Medical Center), Makiko Koyabu(Nagasaki Medical Center), Terufumi Yokoyama(Nagasaki Medical Center), Kiyoshi Migita(Nagasaki Medical Center), Manabu Daikoku(Nagasaki Medical Center), Seigo Abiru(Nagasaki Medical Center), Hiroshi Yatsuhashi(Nagasaki Medical Center), Eiichi Takezaki(National Hospital Organization), Naohiko Masaki(National Hospital Organization), Kazuhiro Sugi(National Hospital Organization), Koichi Honda(National Hospital Organization), Hiroshi Adachi(National Hospital Organization), Hidehiro Nishi(National Hospital Organization), Yukio Watanabe(National Hospital Organization), Yoko Nakamura(National Hospital Organization), Masaaki Shimada(National Hospital Organization), Tatsuji Komatsu(National Hospital Organization), Akira Saito(National Hospital Organization), Takeo Saoshiro(National Hospital Organization), Hideharu Harada(National Hospital Organization), Takeshi Sodeyama(National Hospital Organization), Shigeki Hayashi(National Hospital Organization), Akihide Masumoto(National Hospital Organization), Takehiro Sando(National Hospital Organization), Tetsuo Yamamoto(National Hospital Organization), Hironori Sakai(National Hospital Organization), Masakazu Kobayashi(National Hospital Organization), Toyokichi Muro(National Hospital Organization), Michiaki Koga(National Hospital Organization), Zakera Shums(Nova Medical (United States)), Gary L. Norman(Nova Medical (United States)), Hiromi Ishibashi(Nagasaki Medical Center)
Hepatology
December 22, 2006
Cited by 361Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The predictive role of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) remains elusive in the long-term outcome of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The progression of PBC was evaluated in association with ANAs using stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression and an unconditional stepwise logistic regression model based on the data of 276 biopsy-proven, definite PBC patients who have been registered to the National Hospital Organization Study Group for Liver Disease in Japan (NHOSLJ). When death of hepatic failure/liver transplantation (LT) was defined as an end-point, positive anti-gp210 antibodies (Hazard ratio (HR) = 6.742, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.408, 18.877), the late stage (Scheuer's stage 3, 4) (HR = 4.285, 95% CI:1.682,10.913) and male sex (HR = 3.266, 95% CI: 1.321,8.075) were significant risk factors at the time of initial liver biopsy. When clinical progression to death of hepatic failure/LT (i.e., hepatic failure type progression) or to the development of esophageal varices or hepatocellular carcinoma without developing jaundice (Total bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL) (i.e., portal hypertension type progression) was defined as an end-point in the early stage (Scheuer's stage 1, 2) PBC patients, positive anti-gp210 antibodies was a significant risk factor for hepatic failure type progression [odds ratio (OR) = 33.777, 95% CI: 5.930, 636.745], whereas positive anti-centromere antibodies was a significant risk factor for portal hypertension type progression (OR = 4.202, 95% CI: 1.307, 14.763). Histologically, positive anti-gp210 antibodies was most significantly associated with more severe interface hepatitis and lobular inflammation, whereas positive anticentromere antibodies was most significantly associated with more severe ductular reaction. CONCLUSION: These results indicate 2 different progression types in PBC, hepatic failure type and portal hypertension type progression, which may be represented by positive-anti-gp210 and positive-anticentromere antibodies, respectively.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis