Sentinel Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Biopsy-Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The SN FNAC Study

Jean-François Boileau(McGill University Health Centre), Brigitte Poirier(McGill University Health Centre), Mark Basik(McGill University Health Centre), Claire Holloway(McGill University Health Centre), Louis Gaboury(McGill University Health Centre), Lucas Sidéris(McGill University Health Centre), Sarkis Meterissian(McGill University Health Centre), Angel Arnaout(McGill University Health Centre), Muriel Brackstone(McGill University Health Centre), David R. McCready(McGill University Health Centre), Stephen E. Karp(Lahey Hospital and Medical Center), Isabelle Trop(McGill University Health Centre), A. Lisbona(McGill University Health Centre), Frances C. Wright(McGill University Health Centre), Rami Younan(McGill University Health Centre), Louise Provencher(McGill University Health Centre), Érica Patocskai(McGill University Health Centre), Atilla Ömeroğlu(McGill University Health Centre), André Robidoux(McGill University Health Centre)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
December 2, 2014
Cited by 838

Abstract

PURPOSE: An increasing proportion of patients (> 30%) with node-positive breast cancer will obtain an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). If sentinel node (SN) biopsy (SNB) is accurate in this setting, completion node dissection (CND) morbidity could be avoided. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the prospective multicentric SN FNAC study, patients with biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer (T0-3, N1-2) underwent both SNB and CND. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) use was mandatory, and SN metastases of any size, including isolated tumor cells (ypN0[i+], ≤ 0.2 mm), were considered positive. The optimal SNB identification rate (IR) ≥ 90% and false-negative rate (FNR) ≤ 10% were predetermined. RESULTS: From March 2009 to December 2012, 153 patients were accrued to the study. The SNB IR was 87.6% (127 of 145; 95% CI, 82.2% to 93.0%), and the FNR was 8.4% (seven of 83; 95% CI, 2.4% to 14.4%). If SN ypN0(i+)s had been considered negative, the FNR would have increased to 13.3% (11 of 83; 95% CI, 6.0% to 20.6%). There was no correlation between size of SN metastases and rate of positive non-SNs. Using this method, 30.3% of patients could potentially avoid CND. CONCLUSION: In biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer after NAC, a low SNB FNR (8.4%) can be achieved with mandatory use of IHC. SN metastases of any size should be considered positive. The SNB IR was 87.6%, and in the presence of a technical failure, axillary node dissection should be performed. We recommend that SN evaluation with IHC be further evaluated before being included in future guidelines on the use of SNB after NAC in this setting.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis