Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles in intact and damaged regions of human osteoarthritic cartilage

Tomoo Sato(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Koji Konomi(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Satoshi Yamasaki(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Satoko Aratani(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Kaneyuki Tsuchimochi(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Masahiro Yokouchi(Kagoshima University), Kayo Masuko‐Hongo(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Naoko Yagishita(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Hiroshi Nakamura(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Setsuro Komiya(Kagoshima University), Moroe Beppu(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Haruhito Aoki(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Kusuki Nishioka(St. Marianna University School of Medicine), Toshihiro Nakajima(St. Marianna University School of Medicine)
Arthritis & Rheumatism
February 28, 2006
Cited by 162

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the differences in gene expression profiles of chondrocytes in intact and damaged regions of cartilage from the same knee joint of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: We compared messenger RNA expression profiles in regions of intact and damaged cartilage (classified according to the Mankin scale) obtained from patients with knee OA. Five pairs of intact and damaged regions of OA cartilage were evaluated by oligonucleotide array analysis using a double in vitro transcription amplification technique. The microarray data were confirmed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and were compared with previously published data. RESULTS: About 1,500 transcripts, which corresponded to 8% of the expressed transcripts, showed > or = 2-fold differences in expression between the cartilage tissue pairs. Approximately 10% of these transcripts (n = 151) were commonly expressed in the 5 patient samples. Accordingly, 114 genes (35 genes expressed in intact > damaged; 79 genes expressed in intact < damaged) were selected. The expression of some genes related to the wound-healing process, including cell proliferation and interstitial collagen synthesis, was higher in damaged regions than in intact regions, similar to the findings for genes that inhibit matrix degradation. Comparisons of the real-time quantitative PCR data with the previously reported data support the validity of our microarray data. CONCLUSION: Differences between intact and damaged regions of OA cartilage exhibited a similar pattern among the 5 patients examined, indicating the presence of common mechanisms that contribute to cartilage destruction. Elucidation of this mechanism is important for the development of effective treatments for OA.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis