Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology

John W. Mansfıeld(Imperial College London), Stéphane Genin(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Shimpei Magori(State University of New York), Vitaly Citovsky(State University of New York), Malinee Sriariyanum(King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok), Pamela C. Ronald(University of California, Davis), J. Maxwell Dow(University College Cork), Valérie Verdier(Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), Steven V. Beer(Cornell University), Marcos Antônio Machado, Ian K. Toth(James Hutton Institute), George P. C. Salmond(University of Cambridge), Gary D. Foster(University of Bristol)
Molecular Plant Pathology
June 5, 2012
Cited by 2,369Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Many plant bacteriologists, if not all, feel that their particular microbe should appear in any list of the most important bacterial plant pathogens. However, to our knowledge, no such list exists. The aim of this review was to survey all bacterial pathologists with an association with the journal Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate the bacterial pathogens they would place in a 'Top 10' based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated 458 votes from the international community, and allowed the construction of a Top 10 bacterial plant pathogen list. The list includes, in rank order: (1) Pseudomonas syringae pathovars; (2) Ralstonia solanacearum; (3) Agrobacterium tumefaciens; (4) Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae; (5) Xanthomonas campestris pathovars; (6) Xanthomonas axonopodis pathovars; (7) Erwinia amylovora; (8) Xylella fastidiosa; (9) Dickeya (dadantii and solani); (10) Pectobacterium carotovorum (and Pectobacterium atrosepticum). Bacteria garnering honourable mentions for just missing out on the Top 10 include Clavibacter michiganensis (michiganensis and sepedonicus), Pseudomonas savastanoi and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. This review article presents a short section on each bacterium in the Top 10 list and its importance, with the intention of initiating discussion and debate amongst the plant bacteriology community, as well as laying down a benchmark. It will be interesting to see, in future years, how perceptions change and which bacterial pathogens enter and leave the Top 10.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis