Determinants and normal values of ascending aortic diameter by age, gender, and race/ethnicity in the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Evrim Türkbey(National Institutes of Health Clinical Center), Aditya Jain(Johns Hopkins University), Craig Johnson(University of Washington), Alban Redheuil(Délégation Paris 5), Andrew E. Arai(National Institutes of Health), Antoinette S. Gomes(University of California, Los Angeles), James Carr(Northwestern University), W. Gregory Hundley(Wake Forest University), Gisela Teixidó‐Turà(Johns Hopkins University), John Eng(Johns Hopkins University), João A.C. Lima(Johns Hopkins University), David A. Bluemke(Johns Hopkins University)
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
May 16, 2013
Cited by 119Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the normal size and wall thickness of the ascending thoracic aorta (AA) and its relationship with cardiovascular risk factors in a large population-based study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mean AA luminal diameter was measured in 3573 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participants (age: 45-84 years), using gradient echo phase contrast cine MRI. Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between risk factors and AA diameter. The median and upper normal limit (95th percentile) was defined in a "healthy" subgroup as well as AA wall thickness. RESULTS: The upper limits of body surface area indexed AA luminal diameter for age categories of 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75-84 years are 21, 22, 22, and 28 mm/m(2) in women and 20, 21, 22, 23 mm/m(2) in men, respectively. The mean AA wall thickness was 2.8 mm. Age, gender, and body surface area were major determinants of AA luminal diameter (∼+1 mm/10 years; ∼+1.9 mm in men than women; ∼+1 mm/ 0.23 m(2) ; P < 0.001). The AA diameter in hypertensive subjects was +0.9 mm larger than in normotensives (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AA diameter increases gradually with aging for both genders among all race/ethnicities. The normal value of AA diameter is provided.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis