Gene-Panel Sequencing and the Prediction of Breast-Cancer Risk

Douglas F. Easton(Cancer Research UK), Paul D.P. Pharoah, Antonis C. Antoniou, Marc Tischkowitz(Medical Genetics Center), Sean V. Tavtigian(University of Utah), Katherine L. Nathanson(University of Pennsylvania), Peter Devilee(Leiden University Medical Center), Alfons Meindl(Klinikum rechts der Isar), Fergus J. Couch(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Melissa C. Southey(University of Melbourne), David E. Goldgar(University of Utah), D. Gareth Evans(University of Manchester), Georgia Chenevix‐Trench(QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute), Nazneen Rahman, Mark E. Robson(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Susan M. Domchek(University of Pennsylvania), William D. Foulkes(McGill University Health Centre)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 27, 2015
Cited by 935Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Advances in sequencing technology have made multigene testing, or “panel testing,” a practical option when looking for genetic variants that may be associated with a risk of breast cancer. In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated specific claims made by Myriad Genetics with respect to the patenting of the genomic DNA sequence of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Other companies immediately began to offer panel tests for breast cancer genes that included BRCA1 and BRCA2. The subsequent flourishing of gene-panel testing services has generated much interest both within the clinical genetics community and in the popular press. These panels cover a total of more than 100 genes, and breast cancer is specifically mentioned as an indication for 21 of these genes. However, the fact that the technology is available does not necessarily mean that such tests are appropriate or desirable.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis