Outcomes of splenectomy in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID): a survey of 45 patients

Gabriel K.Y. Wong(Heartlands Hospital), Sigune Goldacker(University Medical Center Freiburg), C Winterhalter(University Medical Center Freiburg), Bodo Grimbacher(The Royal Free Hospital), Helen Chapel(University of Oxford), Mary Lucas(University of Oxford), Diana Alecsandru(The Royal Free Hospital), David A. McEwen(University of Oxford), Isabella Quinti(Sapienza University of Rome), Hélène Martini(Sapienza University of Rome), Reinhold Schmidt(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Diana Ernst(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Teresa Español(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Antonio Vidaller(Bellvitge University Hospital), Javier Carbone(Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Eduardo Fernández‐Cruz(Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Vassilios Lougaris(University of Brescia), Alessandro Plebani(University of Brescia), Necil Kütükçüler(Ege University), Luis Ignacio González‐Granado, Roland Contreras, Sorena Kiani‐Alikhan(King's College London), Mohammad A. A. Ibrahim(King's College London), Jiří Litzman(Masaryk University), Alison Jones(Great Ormond Street Hospital), H. Bobby Gaspar(Great Ormond Street Hospital), Lennart Hammarström(Karolinska University Hospital), Ulrich Baumann(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Klaus Warnatz(University Medical Center Freiburg), Aarnoud Huissoon(Heartlands Hospital)
Clinical & Experimental Immunology
November 23, 2012
Cited by 74Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Splenectomy has been used in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID), mainly in the context of refractory autoimmune cytopenia and suspected lymphoma, but there are understandable concerns about the potential of compounding an existing immunodeficiency. With increasing use of rituximab as an alternative treatment for refractory autoimmune cytopenia, the role of splenectomy in CVID needs to be re-examined. This retrospective study provides the largest cohesive data set to date describing the outcome of splenectomy in 45 CVID patients in the past 40 years. Splenectomy proved to be an effective long-term treatment in 75% of CVID patients with autoimmune cytopenia, even in some cases when rituximab had failed. Splenectomy does not worsen mortality in CVID and adequate immunoglobulin replacement therapy appears to play a protective role in overwhelming post-splenectomy infections. Future trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of rituximab and splenectomy are needed to provide clearer guidance on the second-line management of autoimmune cytopenia in CVID.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis