Impact of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Resistance on Effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Therapy for Malaria in Pregnancy at Clearing Infections and Preventing Low Birth Weight

Meghna Desai(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Julie Gutman(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Steve M. Taylor(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Ryan E. Wiegand(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Carole Khairallah(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Kassoum Kayentao(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Peter Ouma(Kenya Medical Research Institute), Sheick Oumar Coulibaly(Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo), Linda Kalilani(University of Malawi), Kimberly E. Mace(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Emmanuel Arinaitwe(Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration), Don P. Mathanga(University of Malawi), Ogobara K. Doumbo(Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako), Kephas Otieno(Kenya Medical Research Institute), Edgar Dabira(Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo), Ebbie Chaluluka(University of Malawi), Mulakwa Kamuliwo(National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council), Veronica Ades(NYU Langone Health), Jacek Skarbinski(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Ya Ping Shi(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Pascal Magnussen(University of Copenhagen), Steve Meshnick(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Feiko O. ter Kuile(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine)
Clinical Infectious Diseases
October 20, 2015
Cited by 189Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Owing to increasing sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance in sub-Saharan Africa, monitoring the effectiveness of intermittent preventive therapy in pregnancy (IPTp) with SP is crucial. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2013, both the efficacy of IPTp-SP at clearing existing peripheral malaria infections and the effectiveness of IPTp-SP at reducing low birth weight (LBW) were assessed among human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected participants in 8 sites in 6 countries. Sites were classified as high, medium, or low resistance after measuring parasite mutations conferring SP resistance. An individual-level prospective pooled analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Among 1222 parasitemic pregnant women, overall polymerase chain reaction-uncorrected and -corrected failure rates by day 42 were 21.3% and 10.0%, respectively (39.7% and 21.1% in high-resistance areas; 4.9% and 1.1% in low-resistance areas). Median time to recurrence decreased with increasing prevalence of Pfdhps-K540E. Among 6099 women at delivery, IPTp-SP was associated with a 22% reduction in the risk of LBW (prevalence ratio [PR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], .69-.88; P < .001). This association was not modified by insecticide-treated net use or gravidity, and remained significant in areas with high SP resistance (PR, 0.81; 95% CI, .67-.97; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SP to clear peripheral parasites and prevent new infections during pregnancy is compromised in areas with >90% prevalence of Pfdhps-K540E. Nevertheless, in these high-resistance areas, IPTp-SP use remains associated with increases in birth weight and maternal hemoglobin. The effectiveness of IPTp in eastern and southern Africa is threatened by further increases in SP resistance and reinforces the need to evaluate alternative drugs and strategies for the control of malaria in pregnancy.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis