<i>ESR1</i> Mutations in Circulating Plasma Tumor DNA from Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

David Chu(Johns Hopkins University), Costanza Paoletti(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Christina L. Gersch(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Dustin A. VanDenBerg(Johns Hopkins University), Daniel J. Zabransky(Johns Hopkins University), Rory L. Cochran(Johns Hopkins University), Hong Yuen Wong(Johns Hopkins University), Patricia Valda Toro(Johns Hopkins University), Justin Cidado(Johns Hopkins University), Sarah Croessmann(Johns Hopkins University), Bracha Erlanger(Johns Hopkins University), Karen Cravero(Johns Hopkins University), Kelly Kyker‐Snowman(Johns Hopkins University), Berry Button(Johns Hopkins University), Heather A. Parsons(Johns Hopkins University), W. Brian Dalton(Johns Hopkins University), Riaz Gillani(Johns Hopkins University), Arielle J. Medford(Johns Hopkins University), Kimberly Aung(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Nahomi Tokudome(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Arul M. Chinnaiyan(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Anne F. Schott(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Dan R. Robinson(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Karen S. Jacks(Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada), Josh Lauring(Johns Hopkins University), Paula J. Hurley(Johns Hopkins University), Daniel F. Hayes(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), James M. Rae(Michigan Center for Translational Pathology), Ben Ho Park(Johns Hopkins University)
Clinical Cancer Research
August 10, 2015
Cited by 174Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Mutations in the estrogen receptor (ER)α gene, ESR1, have been identified in breast cancer metastases after progression on endocrine therapies. Because of limitations of metastatic biopsies, the reported frequency of ESR1 mutations may be underestimated. Here, we show a high frequency of ESR1 mutations using circulating plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA) from patients with metastatic breast cancer. Experimental Design: We retrospectively obtained plasma samples from eight patients with known ESR1 mutations and three patients with wild-type ESR1 identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of biopsied metastatic tissues. Three common ESR1 mutations were queried for using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). In a prospective cohort, metastatic tissue and plasma were collected contemporaneously from eight ER-positive and four ER-negative patients. Tissue biopsies were sequenced by NGS, and ptDNA ESR1 mutations were analyzed by ddPCR. Results: In the retrospective cohort, all corresponding mutations were detected in ptDNA, with two patients harboring additional ESR1 mutations not present in their metastatic tissues. In the prospective cohort, three ER-positive patients did not have adequate tissue for NGS, and no ESR1 mutations were identified in tissue biopsies from the other nine patients. In contrast, ddPCR detected seven ptDNA ESR1 mutations in 6 of 12 patients (50%). Conclusions: We show that ESR1 mutations can occur at a high frequency and suggest that blood can be used to identify additional mutations not found by sequencing of a single metastatic lesion. Clin Cancer Res; 22(4); 993–9. ©2015 AACR.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis