Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference

Khaled Ezzedine(Université de Bordeaux), Henry W. Lim(Henry Ford Hospital), Tamio Suzuki(Yamagata University), Ichiro Katayama(The University of Osaka), Iltefat Hamzavi(Henry Ford Hospital), C. Lan(Kaohsiung Medical University), B. K. Goh(National Skin Centre), Tag S. Anbar(Minia University Hospital), C. Silva de Castro(Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná), Azalea Lee(Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital), Davinder Parsad(Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research), Nanja van Geel(Ghent University Hospital), I. Caroline Le Poole(Loyola University Chicago), Naoki Oiso(Kindai University), Laïla Benzekri(Mohammed V University), Richard A. Spritz(University of Colorado Denver), Yvon Gauthier(Université de Bordeaux), Seung Kyung Hann, Mauro Picardo(San Gallicano Hospital), Alain Taı̈eb(Université de Bordeaux), on behalf of the Vitiligo Global Issue Consensus Conference panelists
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
March 14, 2012
Cited by 676Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

During the 2011 International Pigment Cell Conference (IPCC), the Vitiligo European Taskforce (VETF) convened a consensus conference on issues of global importance for vitiligo clinical research. As suggested by an international panel of experts, the conference focused on four topics: classification and nomenclature; definition of stable disease; definition of Koebner's phenomenon (KP); and 'autoimmune vitiligo'. These topics were discussed in seven working groups representing different geographical regions. A consensus emerged that segmental vitiligo be classified separately from all other forms of vitiligo and that the term 'vitiligo' be used as an umbrella term for all non-segmental forms of vitiligo, including 'mixed vitiligo' in which segmental and non-segmental vitiligo are combined and which is considered a subgroup of vitiligo. Further, the conference recommends that disease stability be best assessed based on the stability of individual lesions rather than the overall stability of the disease as the latter is difficult to define precisely and reliably. The conference also endorsed the classification of KP for vitiligo as proposed by the VETF (history based, clinical observation based, or experimentally induced). Lastly, the conference agreed that 'autoimmune vitiligo' should not be used as a separate classification as published evidence indicates that the pathophysiology of all forms of vitiligo likely involves autoimmune or inflammatory mechanisms.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis