Comparison of 3D versus 2D 13N-ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging

Jennifer M. Renaud(University of Ottawa), Robert A. deKemp(University of Ottawa), Ran Klein(St. Michael's Hospital), Jean N. DaSilva(Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Robert Beanlands(University of Ottawa)

Unknown

May 1, 2010

Cited by 1

Related Papers

Impaired Myocardial Flow Reserve on Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Patients Assessed for Myocardial Ischemia

|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2011|602

The Use of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Including the Ontario Experience

|Journal of Nuclear Medicine|2012|512

F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging-Assisted Management of Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Suspected Coronary Disease

|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2007|476

Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and therapeutic interventions

|Atherosclerosis|2018|430

Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease?

|Journal of Nuclear Cardiology|2012|303