A call for benchmarking transposable element annotation methods

Douglas R. Hoen(McGill University), Glenn Hickey(McGill University), Guillaume Bourque(McGill University), Josep Casacuberta(Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics), Richard Cordaux(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Cédric Feschotte(University of Utah), Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier(Université de Montpellier), Aurélie Hua‐Van(Université Paris-Sud), Robert Hubley(Institute for Systems Biology), Aurélie Kapusta(University of Utah), Emmanuelle Lerat(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Florian Maumus, David D. Pollock(University of Colorado Denver), Hadi Quesneville, Arian F. A. Smit(Institute for Systems Biology), Travis J. Wheeler(University of Montana), Thomas E. Bureau(McGill University), Mathieu Blanchette(McGill University)
Mobile DNA
August 3, 2015
Cited by 99Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

DNA derived from transposable elements (TEs) constitutes large parts of the genomes of complex eukaryotes, with major impacts not only on genomic research but also on how organisms evolve and function. Although a variety of methods and tools have been developed to detect and annotate TEs, there are as yet no standard benchmarks-that is, no standard way to measure or compare their accuracy. This lack of accuracy assessment calls into question conclusions from a wide range of research that depends explicitly or implicitly on TE annotation. In the absence of standard benchmarks, toolmakers are impeded in improving their tools, annotators cannot properly assess which tools might best suit their needs, and downstream researchers cannot judge how accuracy limitations might impact their studies. We therefore propose that the TE research community create and adopt standard TE annotation benchmarks, and we call for other researchers to join the authors in making this long-overdue effort a success.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis