Accessory cells in immune suppression. III. Evidence for two distinct accessory cell-dependent mechanisms of T lymphocyte-mediated suppression.

G Moser(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Guijuan Cheng(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Abdenour Abbas(Brigham and Women's Hospital)
The Journal of Immunology
November 1, 1986
Cited by 8

Abstract

Suppression of antibody secretion by the 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP)-binding BALB/c myeloma, MOPC 315, by idiotype- and hapten-reactive suppressor T cells is mediated by secreted factors (TsF) and requires the presence of accessory cells (AC). Idiotype-specific TsF functions only in the presence of Ia+ AC and is completely idiotype specific. Moreover, no suppression is observed when myeloma targets and AC are separated by cell-impermeable membranes, indicating that the role of AC may be to bind, focus, and/or present TsF to the myeloma cells. In contrast, TNP-specific TsF inhibits myeloma function in the presence of TNP-protein and activated macrophages that are not Ia+. This form of suppression is nonspecific at the effector stage; i.e., anti-TNP TsF inhibits a non-TNP binding cell line, TEPC 15, as long as TNP-protein and activated macrophages are present. Moreover, suppression occurs even when myeloma targets and AC are separated by cell-impermeable membranes. These results are consistent with the view that hapten-reactive TsF binds to antigen on the surface of macrophages and induces these cells to secrete nonspecific immunosuppressive molecules. Thus, different types of AC may play fundamentally different roles in TsF-mediated suppression; they may either bind and present TsF to targets (as in the case of idiotype-specific TsF) or secrete nonspecific immunosuppressants as a consequence of a TsF-antigen interaction (hapten-specific TsF). Autonomous, suppressible targets provide valuable experimental systems for analyzing the cellular interactions in T cell-mediated suppression.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis