Efficacy and Safety of Tangshen Formula on Patients with Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Multicenter Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Ping Li(China-Japan Friendship Hospital), Yiping Chen(Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Jianping Liu(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine), Jing Hong(China-Japan Friendship Hospital), Yueyi Deng(Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Fang Yang(North China University of Science and Technology), Jin Xiu-ping(North China University of Science and Technology), Jing Gao(Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine), Jing Li(Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine), Hui Fang(Tangshan Gongren Hospital), Geling Liu(Tangshan Gongren Hospital), Liping Shi(Kailuan General Hospital), J. Du(China-Japan Friendship Hospital), Yang Li(Renmin University of China), Meihua Yan(China-Japan Friendship Hospital), Yumin Wen(China-Japan Friendship Hospital), Wenying Yang(China-Japan Friendship Hospital)
PLoS ONE
May 4, 2015
Cited by 87Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persons with diabetes are at high risk of developing diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current drug therapies for DKD, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), are not entirely satisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate the additional benefit and safety of the Chinese herbal granule Tangshen Formula (TSF) in treating DKD. METHODS: The study was designed as a six-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. From April 2007 through December 2009, 180 patients with DKD were enrolled. In addition to conventional treatment with ACEIs or ARBs, 122 participants were randomly assigned to receive TSF and 58 participants to receive placebo for 24 weeks. Primary outcome was urinary protein level, measured by urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) for participants with microalbuminuria, 24-hour urinary protein (24h UP) for participants with macroalbuminuria. Secondary outcomes included renal function, serum lipids, quality of life, symptoms, and adverse events. FINDINGS: After 24 weeks of treatment, no statistically significant difference in UAER (TSF -19.53 μg/min compared with placebo -7.01 μg/min, with a mean difference of -12.52 μg/min; 95%CI, -68.67 to 43.63, P = 0.696) was found between TSF and placebo groups. However, TSF displayed a statistically significant decrease in 24h UP (TSF-0.21 g compared with placebo 0.36 g, with a mean difference of -0.57g; 95%CI, -1.05 to -0.09, P = 0.024). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was improved in both patients with microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria, with a mean difference of 15.51 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI, 3.71 to 27.31), 9.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI, -0.10 to 18.13), respectively. Other secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between groups or in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Based on conventional treatments, TSF appears to provide additional benefits compared with placebo in decreasing proteinuria and improving eGFR in DKD patients with macroalbuminuria. Nevertheless, further study is needed to evaluate TSF treating patients with microalbuminuria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-10000843.


Related Papers