Criteria to distinguish between regional and contact zone monazite – a case study from Proterozoic North Delhi Fold Belt (NDFB), India
Mayuri Pandey(Banaras Hindu University), Santosh Kumar(University of Delhi), N. C. Pant(University of Delhi)
Cited by 29
Related Papers
Growth of the Greater Indian Landmass and its assembly in Rodinia: Geochronological evidence from the Central Indian Tectonic Zone
|Gondwana Research|2011|216
Lithostructural and chronological constraints for tectonic restoration of Proterozoic accretion in the Eastern Indian Precambrian shield
|Precambrian Research|2011|135
Neoarchean high-pressure margarite–phengitic muscovite–chlorite corona mantled corundum in quartz-free high-Mg, Al phlogopite–chlorite schists from the Bundelkhand craton, north central India
|Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology|2010|106
∼1.6 Ga ultrahigh‐temperature granulite metamorphism in the Central Indian Tectonic Zone: insights from metamorphic reaction history, geothermobarometry and monazite chemical ages
|Geological Journal|2010|101
Evidence for Pre-Grenvillian High-Pressure Granulite Metamorphism from the Northern Margin of the Sausar Mobile Belt in Central India
|Journal of the Geological Society of India|1999|99