Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Anushka Patel(The University of Sydney), Anushka Patel(The University of Sydney), Stephen MacMahon(The University of Sydney), John Chalmers(The University of Sydney), Bruce Neal(The University of Sydney), Laurent Billot(Université Paris Cité), Mark Woodward, Michel Marre(The University of Queensland), Mark E. Cooper(Utrecht University), Paul Glasziou(Université de Montréal), Diederick E. Grobbee(The University of Melbourne), Pavel Hamet(University of Sheffield), Stephen Harrap(Hypertension Institute), Simon Heller(IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano), Lisheng Liu(Aarhus University), Giuseppe Mancia(Chinese General Hospital College of Nursing and Liberal Arts), C. E. Mogensen(St Mary's Hospital), Changyu Pan(University of Auckland), Neil R Poulter(University of Leicester), Anthony Rodgers(The George Institute for Global Health), Bryan Williams(Radboud University Nijmegen), Séverine Bompoint(The University of Sydney), Bastiaan E. de Galan(Université Paris Cité), Rohina Joshi
New England Journal of Medicine
June 6, 2008
Cited by 7,397Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis