Clinical Profiles of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Apical Phenotype Comparison of Pure-Apical Form and Distal-Dominant Form

Toru Kubo(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Hiroaki Kitaoka(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Makoto Okawa(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Takayoshi Hirota(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Eri Hoshikawa(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Kayo Hayato(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Naohito Yamasaki(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Yoshihisa Matsumura(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Toshikazu Yabe(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Masanori Nishinaga(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Jun Takata(Kochi Medical School Hospital), Yoshinori L. Doi(Kochi Medical School Hospital)
Circulation Journal
January 1, 2009
Cited by 62

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with an apical phenotype, in which hypertrophy of the myocardium predominantly involves the apex of the left ventricle, is not uncommon in Japan, but its morphologic variations are not well recognized. The aim of this study was to investigate if these variations have different clinical characteristics although they are still confused to be the same. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with the apical phenotype were divided into 2 groups, the "pure-apical" form and the "distal-dominant" form, and their clinical profiles were compared. From the study cohort of 264 patients with HCM, 80 (30%) were classified as having the apical phenotype: 51 with the pure-apical form and 29 with the distal-dominant form. The age at diagnosis was approximately 60 years, and in both groups the majority were male. The distal-dominant group had a significantly larger left atrial diameter (43 vs 39 mm) and higher ratio of proven familial HCM (28 vs 6%), and were more symptomatic (New York Heart Association >or=3) at presentation (17 vs 0%). The event-free rate of cardiovascular events in patients with the distal-dominant form was significantly worse (log-rank P=0.012) than that in patients with the pure-apical form (follow-up period: asymptotically approximately 5 years). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 phenotypes of apical HCM should be recognized and distinguished clinically.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis