A

A. R. Leeds

University of London

Publishes on Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment, Food composition and properties, Polysaccharides Composition and Applications. 28 papers and 3.3k citations.

28Publications
3.3kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Dietary fibres, fibre analogues, and glucose tolerance: importance of viscosity.
Cited by 1.2kOpen Access

To define the type of dietary fibre of fibre analogue with the greatest potential use in diabetic treatment, groups of four to six volunteers underwent 50-g glucose tolerance tests (GTT) with and without the addition of either guar, pectin, gum tragacanth, methylcellulose, wheat bran, or cholestyramine equivalent to 12 g fibre. The addition of each substance significantly reduced blood glucose concentration at one or more points during the GTT and generally reduced serum insulin concentrations. The greatest flattening of the glucose response was seen with guar, but this effect was abolished when hydrolysed non-viscous guar was used. The reduction in the mean peak rise in blood glucose concentration for each substance correlated positively with its viscosity (r = 0.926; P less than 0.01), as did delay in mouth-to-caecum transit time (r = 0.885; P less than 0.02). Viscous types of dietary fibre are therefore most likely to be therapeutically useful in modifying postprandial hyperglycaemia.

A Simple Method of Measuring Breath Hydrogen in Carbohydrate Malabsorption by End-Expiratory Sampling
Geoffrey Metz, M.A. Gassull, A. R. Leeds et al.|Clinical Science|1976
Cited by 225

1. A simple method is described for measuring the hydrogen concentration in alveolar air by end-expiratory sampling, by using a modified Haldane-Priestley tube and gas chromatography. Hydrogen was generated in vivo by ingestion of the non-absorbable sugar lactulose. 2. Alveolar hydrogen concentration showed a highly significant correlation with hydrogen production measured either by a rebreathing technique or by a total collection procedure. 3. The coefficient of variation of the end-expiratory method, assessed by comparing sixty-one paired results, was 11-6%. The coefficient of variation in ten measurements in one subject at 1 min intervals was 17-6%.