J

Jeffrey A. Sloan

Mayo Clinic

Publishes on Cancer survivorship and care, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues. 86 papers and 4.5k citations.

86Publications
4.5kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Distress and Career Satisfaction Among 14 Surgical Specialties, Comparing Academic and Private Practice Settings
Charles M. Balch, Tait D. Shanafelt, Jeffrey A. Sloan et al.|Annals of Surgery|2011
Cited by 327

OBJECTIVE(S): We compared distress parameters and career satisfaction from survey results of surgeons from 14 specialties practicing in an academic versus private practice environment. METHODS: The 2008 American College of Surgeons survey evaluated demographic variables, practice characteristics, career satisfaction, and distress parameters using validated instruments. RESULTS: The practice setting (academic vs. private practice) was independently associated with burnout in a multivariate (MV) analysis (odds ratio [OR] 1.172, P = 0.02). Academic surgeons were less likely to experience burnout compared to those in private practice (37.7% vs. 43.1%), less likely to screen positive for depression (27.6% vs. 33%) or to have suicide ideation (4.7% vs. 7.4%; all P < 0.0001). They were also more likely to have career satisfaction (77.4% of academic surgeons would become a surgeon again vs. 64.9% for those in private practice; P < 0.0001)) and to recommend a medical career to their children (61.3% vs. 43.7%, P < 0.0001). For academic surgeons, the most significant positive associations with burnout were: (1) trauma surgery (OR 1.513, P = 0.0059), (2) nights on call (OR 1.062, P = 0.0123), and (3) hours worked (OR 1.019, P < 0.0001), whereas the negative associations were: (1) having older children (>22 years; OR 0.529, P < 0.0001), (2) pediatric surgery (OR 0.583, P = 0.0053), (3) cardiothoracic surgery (OR 0.626, P = 0.0117), and (4) being male (OR 0.787, P = 0.0491). In a private practice setting, the most significant positive associations with burnout were: (1) urologic surgery (OR 1.497, P = 0.0086), (2) having 31% to 50% time for nonclinical activities (OR 1.404, P = 0.0409), (3) incentive based pay (OR 1.344, P < 0.0001), (4) nights on call (OR 1.045, P = 0.0029), and (5) hours worked (OR 1.015, P < 0.0001), whereas the negative associations were: (1) older children (OR 0.677, P = 0.0001), (2) physician spouse (OR 0.753, P = 0.0093), and (3) older age (OR 0.989, P = 0.0158). The independent factors relating to career satisfaction for surgeons in private practice and academic practice were also different. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with burnout were distinct for academic and private practice surgeons. Distress parameters were lower and career satisfaction higher for academic surgeons.

Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
Kinta Beaver, Karen Luker, R. Glynn Owens et al.|Cancer Nursing|1996
Cited by 276

The purpose of this study was to explore the hypothesis that women with breast cancer had specific preferences about the degree of control they wanted over treatment decision making. One hundred fifty women, newly diagnosed with breast cancer, were interviewed and their preferences for participation in treatment decision making were established using a measurement tool designed to elicit decision-making preferences (Degner LF, Sloan JF. Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:944-50). Two hundred women with benign breast disease served as a descriptive comparison group. Unfolding theory (Coombs CH. A theory of data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964) provided a means of analyzing the data so that the degree of control preferred by each woman could be established. The majority of the newly diagnosed women preferred to play a passive role in treatment decision making, leaving the decision-making responsibility to their physician, whereas the benign control group preferred a collaborative role in which joint decisions could be made between the patient and the physician. The implications of the results for patient participation are discussed.