B. Crickx

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as a first-line monotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (SCCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received cetuximab (initial dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m(2)) for at least 6 weeks with a 48-week follow-up. The primary end point was the disease control rate (DCR) at 6 weeks (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] criteria). Secondary end points included best response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity assessment. Association of treatment efficacy with RAS mutations or FcγR genotypes was investigated. RESULTS: Median age of the study population was 79 years. DCR at 6 weeks was obtained in 25 of 36 patients (69%; 95% CI, 52% to 84%) of the intention-to-treat population. The best responses were eight partial responses and two complete responses. There were no cetuximab-related deaths. There were three related serious adverse events: two grade 4 infusion reactions and one grade 3 interstitial pneumopathy. Grade 1 to 2 acne-like rash occurred in 78% of patients and was associated with prolonged PFS. One HRAS mutation was identified. Combined FcγRIIa-131H/H and/or FcγRIIIa-158V/V polymorphisms were not associated with the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: As a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable SCCS, cetuximab achieved 69% DCR. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to confirm that cetuximab may be considered as a therapeutic option especially in elderly patients. The low frequency of RAS mutations in SCCS makes SCCS tumors attractive for EGFR inhibition.

BACKGROUND: There is a current debate regarding the association of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). METHODS: Seven consecutive patients hospitalized with DRESS were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate evidence of active HHV-6 infection. OBSERVATIONS: The imputable drugs were carbamazepine (5 patients), ibuprofen (1 patient), and sulfasalazine (1 patient). All patients were seropositive for anti-HHV-6 IgG antibodies. Anti-HHV-6 IgM antibodies were detected in 4 of the 7 patients with a seroconversion in 2 patients. Neither anti-cytomegalovirus nor anti-Epstein-Barr virus early antigen IgM antibody was detected. Human herpesvirus 6 genome was not detected by polymerase chain reaction in the first serum sample of all patients. It was weakly detected in skin lesions in the last patient tested by polymerase chain reaction but was not found in uninvolved skin. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest an association between HHV-6 active infection (primo-infection or reactivation) and severe DRESS. Absence of anti-cytomegalovirus or anti-Epstein-Barr virus early antigen IgM antibodies argues against a nonspecific viral reactivation. Human herpesvirus 6 infection may play a role in the development of DRESS in susceptible patients. Some drugs with reactive metabolites could favor reactivation and propagation of HHV-6.

BACKGROUND: Factors implicated in the severity of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) have not been identified. We retrospectively describe and analyze severe cases of DRESS defined by history of intensive care unit admission and death due to DRESS. OBSERVATIONS: Of 15 patients retrospectively recruited in France, 14 were admitted to the intensive care unit and 3 died. The culprit drugs were already known to cause or trigger DRESS: allopurinol, minocycline hydrochloride, anticonvulsants, sulfonamides, and antibiotics. Visceral involvement with severe manifestations responsible for intensive care unit admission or death was variable and often multiple (pneumonitis, hepatitis, renal failure, encephalitis, hemophagocytosis, cardiac failure, and pancytopenia) and resulted in multiorgan failure in 11 patients. These severe complications sometimes developed late in DRESS. Human herpesvirus 6 infection was demonstrated in 6 of 7 patients. In addition, human herpesvirus 6 infection was demonstrated in involved viscera in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Severe DRESS is rare. Some specificities of visceral involvement were associated with allopurinol and minocycline. However, visceral involvement comprising multiorgan failure seemed to be unpredictable. Better knowledge of DRESS is necessary to propose specific and prompt treatment. Early demonstration of human herpesvirus 6 reactivation could be considered a prognostic factor for identifying patients at higher risk and, hence, needs to be evaluated.

BACKGROUND: Few prospective studies are available on the incidence and analysis of the characteristics of adverse cutaneous drug reactions in hospital settings. OBJECTIVES: A 6-month prospective study was managed in our hospital among hospitalized patients to: (i) evaluate the incidence of cutaneous allergic reactions from systemic drugs; (ii) study characteristics of patients with cutaneous drug reactions; (iii) describe the adverse cutaneous reactions; and (iv) evaluate drug reaction imputability and preventability. METHODS: All suspected allergic cutaneous reactions to systemic drugs were collected during a 6-month period (November 2000 to May 2001). Exhaustivity of recording was ensured by regular dissemination of information about this study to the practitioners; a simple method for inclusion by fax was established. Inclusion criteria were suspected cutaneous allergic reactions induced by systemic drugs responsible for hospitalization or developed during hospitalization. A physical examination was done by a dermatologist who completed a standardized questionnaire. Requested information included patient characteristics (associated disorders, severity score), drug intake (list and chronology of the drug intake during the 3 weeks preceding the adverse reaction) and characteristics of the skin reaction (type, course). A group comprising dermatologists and pharmacologists evaluated the drug imputability and preventability. RESULTS: Forty-eight cases were collected. A prevalence of 3.6/1000 among hospitalized patients was estimated. The prevalence rate was higher in patients hospitalized in medical departments (0.5%) than in surgical departments (0.01%) (P < 0.001). The cases were mostly recruited in departments of infectious diseases and dermatology. The most frequent associated disorders were: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (19%), connective tissue disease (10%) and viral or autoimmune hepatitis (12%). Of these patients, 31% had had a previous immunological drug reaction. Adverse cutaneous drug reactions were principally exanthematous (56%). Reactions were considered severe in 34% of cases because they were responsible for hospitalization (18%), increased the duration of hospitalization (14%) or were life threatening (2%). Principal imputable drugs were antibiotics, mainly penicillins. An imputability score was likely in 56% of cases, but it was only possible to conclude definitively in 44% of patients. In 15% of the cases, the side-effect was considered to be preventable. CONCLUSIONS: This study finds a lower incidence than other studies that reported an incidence of 2% of cutaneous drug reactions in hospitalized patients, but only allergic adverse cutaneous reactions induced by systemic drugs were collected in this study. The previous studies were principally done in selected patients hospitalized only in general internal medicine or medical divisions. Our results confirm some data already known about skin drug reactions: HIV infection as a risk factor (P < 0.0001), high prevalence of adverse cutaneous reactions due to antibiotics, and difficulty in ascertaining the imputability of a drug. A high proportion (34%) of these reactions was severe and 15% were avoidable; these two facts justify the development of an intensive programme of clinical pharmacology.

Viral infections are thought to play a part in some cutaneous drug reactions. Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), which is the agent of exanthema subitum (sixth disease), has never been implicated in a drug reaction. We report a patient with severe phenobarbital-induced anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome in whom a fulminant haemophagocytic syndrome was associated with HHV6 infection. We discuss the possible role of HHV6 in this reactive condition.