Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab for New-Onset Generalized Myasthenia GravisImportance: Rituximab is a third-line option for refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) based on empirical evidence, but its effect in new-onset disease is unknown. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab compared with placebo as an add-on to standard of care for MG. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study took place throughout 48 weeks at 7 regional clinics in Sweden. Key inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, onset of generalized symptoms within 12 months or less, and a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score of 6 or more. Patients were screened from October 20, 2016, to March 2, 2020. Key exclusion criteria included pure ocular MG, suspected thymoma, previous thymectomy, and prior noncorticosteroid immunosuppressants or high doses of corticosteroids. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 without stratification to a single intravenous infusion of 500 mg of rituximab or matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Minimal disease manifestations at 16 weeks defined as a QMG score of 4 or less with prednisolone, 10 mg or less daily, and no rescue treatment. Results: Of 87 potentially eligible patients, 25 were randomized to rituximab (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [13.4] years; 7 [28%] female) and 22 to placebo (mean [SD] age, 58 [18.6] years; 7 [32%] female). Compared with placebo, a greater proportion with rituximab met the primary end point; 71% (17 of 24) in the rituximab group vs 29% (6 of 21) in the placebo group (Fisher exact test P = .007; probability ratio, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.20-5.11]). Secondary end points, comparing changes in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life at 16 weeks with QMG at 24 weeks did not differ between groups with censoring for rescue treatment (per-protocol analysis) but were in favor of active treatment when rescue treatment was taken into account by worst rank imputation (post hoc analysis). Rescue treatments were also more frequent in the placebo arm (rituximab: 1 [4%]; placebo, 8 [36%]). One patient in the placebo arm had a myocardial infarction with cardiac arrest and 1 patient in the active arm experienced a fatal cardiac event. Conclusions and Relevance: A single dose of 500 mg of rituximab was associated with greater probability of minimal MG manifestations and reduced need of rescue medications compared with placebo. Further studies are needed to address long-term benefit-risk balance with this treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02950155.
Vitamin <scp>D</scp> deficiency in patients with myasthenia gravis and improvement of fatigue after supplementation of vitamin <scp>D</scp>3: a pilot studyHåkan Askmark, Linnea Haggård, Ingela Nygren et al.|European Journal of Neurology|2012 BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disorder. Vitamin D has important roles both in the autoimmune response and in skeletal muscles. We determined the levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] in patients with MG and in healthy subjects to determine whether vitamin D deficiency is present in MG and whether vitamin D supplementation has beneficial effects on fatigue. METHODS: Plasma levels of 25(OH)D were analyzed in 33 patients with MG (22 males; mean age, 58 years) and in 50 healthy age- and sex-matched blood donors, without vitamin D3 medication. MG composite (MGC) score assessed fatigue. Thirteen patients with MG without previous vitamin D3 supplementation were started on vitamin D3 supplementation (cholecalciferol) 800 IU/day, with a follow-up examination after 2.5-10 months (mean, 6 months). RESULTS: Patients with MG without pre-existing vitamin D3 supplementation (N = 16) had a mean MGC of 4.5 and lower plasma 25(OH)D levels (mean, 51 ± 19 nM) than healthy controls (69 ± 21 nM) (P = 0.017). Seventeen patients had pre-existing vitamin D3 supplementation, because of corticosteroid treatment, and their mean 25(OH)D was 79 ± 22 nM and mean MGC was 5.5. In the 13 patients who received cholecalciferol, 25(OH)D was overall increased at follow-up with 22% (P = 0.033) and MGC score improved by 38% (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma 25(OH)D levels are significantly lower in patients with MG compared with healthy controls. As vitamin D has beneficial effects on the autoimmune response and on fatigue score in patients with MG, we suggest monitoring this parameter in patients with MG and supplementation with vitamin D3 when 25(OH)D levels are low.
Increased Red Blood Cell Polyamines in ALS and Parkinson's DiseaseInitial Experience of the Levodopa–Entacapone–Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Clinical PracticeMezin Öthman, Erik Widman, Ingela Nygren et al.|Journal of Personalized Medicine|2021 Patients in fluctuating stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) require device-aided treatments. Continuous infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is a well-proven option in clinical practice. We now report the first clinical experience of levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) therapy. An observational study of the first patients to start LECIG in our clinic was performed. Twenty-four patients (11 females, 13 males) were included. The median age was 71.5 years, and the median duration since PD diagnosis was 15.5 years. The median treatment duration was 305 days. Median doses were: 6.0 mL as morning dose, 2.5 mL/h as infusion rate, and 1.0 mL as extra dose. Half of the patients were switched directly from LCIG. These patients express improvements in the size and weight of the pump. Furthermore, most of them considered the new pump to be improved regarding user-friendliness. Six patients discontinued LECIG, three due to diarrhea, one due to hallucinations and two deceased (one cardiac arrest and one COVID-19). LECIG has shown to be possible to use in patients with PD, efficacy and safety as expected. Patients are generally happy with the size and usability of the pump, but some technical improvements of the software are warranted, as well as larger, prospective studies.
Nurse or surgeon follow‐up after rectal cancer: a randomized trialAbstract Aim Follow‐up programmes consume a large amount of resources with less time for the surgeon to take on new patients. The aim of this randomized study was to compare patient satisfaction, resource utilization and medical safety in patients curatively operated for rectal cancer who were followed up by either a surgeon or a nurse. Method The nurse was trained by the colorectal surgeon before the start of the study. Curatively operated patients were asked to give their consent to participate. Randomization was performed by the stoma therapist. After each consultation, the patient completed a questionnaire. Results A total of 110 patients (58 men) age 68 (range 41–87) years were included between 2002 and 2005. Only three patients refused participation. Patient satisfaction was high according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): 9.4 for the surgeon and 9.5 for the nurse (NS). Consultation time was longer for the nurse: 24 vs 15 min ( P = 0.001), with more blood samples being taken (29% vs 7%, P = 0.002). Radiological investigations exceeding the routine were made in 11% vs 4% (NS) cases. Surgical assistance was needed in 13 of 182 consultations with the nurse [mean 6 (1–15) min, total 75 min]. Distant metastases were detected in seven patients in the surgeon group and eight in the nurse group ( P = 0.953). Total costs of follow‐up did not differ. Conclusion Patient satisfaction was equally high for the specialist nurse as for the colorectal surgeon. On only a few occasions was surgical assistance necessary and total costs for the follow‐up showed no difference. Medical safety appeared uncompromised. Nurse‐led follow‐up is encouraged.