L

Liudmila G. Lenskaya

Thales (Portugal)

Publishes on Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes. 9 papers and 697 citations.

9Publications
697Total Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Single Intravenous Dose of Oritavancin for Treatment of Acute Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria: Summary of Safety Analysis from the Phase 3 SOLO Studies
G. Ralph Corey, Jeffery S. Loutit, Greg Moeck et al.|Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy|2018
Cited by 25Open Access

Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive organisms. Its rapid concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and long elimination half-life allow single-dose treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). SOLO I and SOLO II were randomized, double-blind studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single 1,200-mg intravenous (i.v.) dose of oritavancin versus twice-daily i.v. vancomycin for 7 to 10 days in ABSSSI patients. Safety data from both studies were pooled for safety analysis. The database comprised pooled safety data for 976 oritavancin-treated patients and 983 vancomycin-treated patients. The incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations due to adverse events were similar for oritavancin (55.3, 5.8, and 3.7%, respectively) and vancomycin (56.9, 5.9, and 4.2%, respectively). The median time to onset (3.8 days versus 3.1 days, respectively) and the duration (3.0 days for both groups) of adverse events were also similar between the two groups. The most frequently reported events were nausea, headache, and vomiting. Greater than 90% of all events were mild or moderate in severity. There were slightly more infections and infestations, abscesses or cellulitis, and hepatic and cardiac adverse events in the oritavancin group; however, more than 80% of these events were mild or moderate. Subgroup analyses did not identify clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of adverse events attributed to oritavancin. A single 1,200-mg dose of oritavancin was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of twice-daily vancomycin. The long elimination half-life of oritavancin compared to that of vancomycin did not result in a clinically meaningful delay to the onset or prolongation of adverse events. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01252719 and NCT01252732.).

Results of multicenter double blind randomized placebo-controlled post-registration clinical study (IV phase)
В. Т. Ивашкин, I. G. Bakulin, Pavel Bogomolov et al.|Russian Journal of Gastroenterology Hepatology Coloproctology|2017
Cited by 10Open Access

Aim of investigation. To estimate efficacy and safety of two pharmacological forms of «Phosphogliv» (lyophilizate for intravenous administration and capsules) for the treatment of fatty liver degeneration of non-alcoholic etiology. Material and methods. Original study included overall 180 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease that were randomized to the basic and control groups in the ratio of 2:1. The basic group patients received Phosphogliv 5 mg/day as intravenous bolus injection for 2 weeks, followed by oral intake of 2 capsules t.i.d. for 10 weeks (the total treatment duration was 12 weeks), control group patients received placebo in the same mode. Serum levels of inflammatory marker adiponectin, NAFLD fibrosis score, treatment effect on quality of life and safety of patients were monitored. Results. In 12 wks in patients with more significant cytolysis (threefold and higher serum alanine transaminase activity) and the rate of adiponectin level improvement on the background of Phosphogliv was 57.9% versus only 10.0% (p=0.019) in the placebo group. The mean NAFLD fibrosis score in the basic group remained almost unchanged, while in the control group negative dynamics was revealed, that resulted in statistically significant differences between groups (2.5±1.2 units versus 2.0±1.3 units respectively; р=0.009). At Phosphogliv injection already during the first 2 wks more pronounced improvement of subjective perception of dyspeptic symptoms was observed (mean score was 5.6±1.3 versus 5.1±1.4; р=0.021). When the treatment course was completed the basic group patients had higher mean score by «level of energy» scale (5.9±1.0 versus 5.6±1.0; р=0.034). Only sporadic adverse effects were found to the background of treatment, no statistically significant differences in their rate in were recorded. Dynamics of the basic physical parameters and laboratory tests was comparable as well. Conclusions. Treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease that includes Phosphogliv provides reduction of steatohepatitis activity, retardation of fibrosis progression, improvement of overall disease prognosis and high satisfaction of patients at a favorable safety profile.