Postoperative Alignment of Total Knee Replacement Its Effect on SurvivalMerrill A. Ritter, Philip M. Faris, E. Michael Keating et al.|Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|1994 Four hundred twenty-one posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasties were performed between 1975 and 1983. Anatomic alignment of the knee was recorded on follow-up evaluations from two months to 13 years postoperatively. Patients were stratified into a normal group that was 5 degrees to 8 degrees anatomic valgus, a varus group that was from 4 degrees anatomic valgus to any degree of varus, and a valgus group that was more than 9 degrees anatomic valgus. There were eight failures, five in the varus group and three in the normal group. There were no failures in the valgus group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed no significant difference between normal and valgus groups; however, there was a statistical difference between the valgus and varus and the normal and varus groups. A surgeon should align a total knee prosthesis in neutral or a slight amount of anatomic valgus to give the patient the best chance for long-term survival.
The Chetranjan Ranawat Award: Tibial Component Failure Mechanisms in Total Knee ArthroplastyMichael E. Berend, Merrill A. Ritter, John B. Meding et al.|Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|2004 The purpose of this study was to examine the failure mechanisms and factors associated with failure of a nonmodular metal backed cemented tibial component. Out of 3152 total knee replacements done for osteoarthritis, 41 tibial components had been revised (1.3%). Four distinct failure mechanisms were identified: 20 knees were revised for medial bone collapse, 13 for ligamentous imbalance, 6 for progressive radiolucencies, and 2 for pain. Factors associated with medial bone collapse were varus tibial component alignment more than 3.0 degrees , Body Mass Index higher than 33.7, and overall postoperative varus limb alignment. Ligamentous imbalance was more prevalent in knees with preoperative valgus deformity. There were no knees revised for tibial component polyethylene wear or osteolysis. We conclude that the dominant failure mechanisms for this component design are related to preoperative deformity, technical factors of component alignment, overall limb alignment, and ligamentous imbalance.
The Effect of Alignment and BMI on Failure of Total Knee ReplacementMerrill A. Ritter, Kenneth Davis, John B. Meding et al.|Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery|2011 BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of tibiofemoral alignment, femoral and tibial component alignment, and body-mass index (BMI) on implant survival following total knee replacement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 6070 knees in 3992 patients with a minimum of two years of follow-up. Each knee was classified on the basis of postoperative alignment (overall tibiofemoral alignment and alignment of the tibial and the femoral component in the coronal plane). Failures (defined as revision for any reason other than infection) were analyzed with use of Cox regression; patient covariates included overall alignment, component alignments, and preoperative BMI. RESULTS: Failure was most likely to occur if the orientation of the tibial component was <90° relative to the tibial axis and the orientation of the femoral component was ≥8° of valgus (failure rate, 8.7%; p < 0.0001). In contrast, failure was least likely to occur if both the tibial and the femoral component were in a neutral orientation (≥90° and <8° of valgus, respectively) (failure rate, 0.2% [nine of 4633]; p < 0.0001). "Correction" of varus or valgus malalignment of the first implanted component by placement of the second component to attain neutral tibiofemoral alignment was associated with a failure rate of 3.2% (p = 0.4922) for varus tibial malalignment and 7.8% (p = 0.0082) for valgus femoral malalignment. A higher BMI was associated with an increased failure rate. Compared with patients with a BMI of 23 to 26 kg/m2, the failure rate in patients with a BMI of ≥41 kg/m2 increased from 0.7% to 2.6% (p = 0.0046) in well-aligned knees, from 1.6% to 2.9% (p = 0.0180) in varus knees, and from 1.0% to 7.1% (p = 0.0260) in valgus knees. CONCLUSIONS: Attaining neutrality in all three alignments is important in maximizing total knee implant survival. Substantial "correction" of the alignment of one component in order to compensate for malalignment of the other component and thus produce a neutrally aligned total knee replacement can increase the risk of failure (p = 0.0082). The use of conventional guides to align a total knee replacement provides acceptable alignment; however, the surgeon should be aware that the patient's size, as determined by the BMI, is also a major factor in total knee replacement failure.
Coronal Alignment in Total Knee ArthroplastyD Fang, Merrill A. Ritter, Kenneth Davis|The Journal of Arthroplasty|2009 Why Are Total Knees Failing Today? Etiology of Total Knee Revision in 2010 and 2011