Sung Hae L. Kang

BACKGROUND: Deletion and the reciprocal duplication in 16p11.2 were recently associated with autism and developmental delay. METHOD: We indentified 27 deletions and 18 duplications of 16p11.2 were identified in 0.6% of all samples submitted for clinical array-CGH (comparative genomic hybridisation) analysis. Detailed molecular and phenotypic characterisations were performed on 17 deletion subjects and ten subjects with the duplication. RESULTS: The most common clinical manifestations in 17 deletion and 10 duplication subjects were speech/language delay and cognitive impairment. Other phenotypes in the deletion patients included motor delay (50%), seizures ( approximately 40%), behavioural problems ( approximately 40%), congenital anomalies ( approximately 30%), and autism ( approximately 20%). The phenotypes among duplication patients included motor delay (6/10), behavioural problems (especially attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)) (6/10), congenital anomalies (5/10), and seizures (3/10). Patients with the 16p11.2 deletion had statistically significant macrocephaly (p<0.0017) and 6 of the 10 patients with the duplication had microcephaly. One subject with the deletion was asymptomatic and another with the duplication had a normal cognitive and behavioural phenotype. Genomic analyses revealed additional complexity to the 16p11.2 region with mechanistic implications. The chromosomal rearrangement was de novo in all but 2 of the 10 deletion cases in which parental studies were available. Additionally, 2 de novo cases were apparently mosaic for the deletion in the analysed blood sample. Three de novo and 2 inherited cases were observed in the 5 of 10 duplication patients where data were available. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 deletion and duplication are characterised by a spectrum of primarily neurocognitive phenotypes that are subject to incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. The autism and macrocephaly observed with deletion and ADHD and microcephaly seen in duplication patients support a diametric model of autism spectrum and psychotic spectrum behavioural phenotypes in genomic sister disorders.

A variety of methods are available to analyze protein-DNA interactions in vivo. Two of the most prominent of these methods are chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and in vivo footprinting. Both of these procedures have specific limitations. For example, the ChIP assay fails to document where exactly a protein binds in vivo. The precipitation of a specific segment of DNA with antibodies directed against DNA-binding proteins does not necessarily indicate that the protein directly interacts with a sequence in the precipitate but could rather reflect protein-protein interactions. Furthermore, the results of in vivo footprinting studies are inconclusive if a DNA sequence is analyzed that is bound by a specific protein in only a certain fraction of cells. Finally, in vivo footprinting does not indicate which protein is bound at a specific site. We have developed a new procedure that combines the ChIP assay and DMS footprinting techniques. Using this method we show here that antibodies specific for USF1 and NF-E2 precipitate the murine beta-globin promoter in MEL cells. DMS footprinting analysis of the DNA precipitated with NF-E2 antibodies revealed a protection over a partial NF-E2-binding site in the beta-globin downstream promoter region. We believe that this novel method will generally benefit investigators interested in analyzing protein-DNA interactions in vivo.

Activating variants in the platelet-derived growth factor receptor β gene (PDGFRB) have been associated with Kosaki overgrowth syndrome, infantile myofibromatosis, and Penttinen premature aging syndrome. A recently described phenotype with fusiform aneurysm has been associated with mosaic PDGFRB c.1685A > G p.(Tyr562Cys) variant. Few reports however have examined the vascular phenotypes and mosaic effects of PDGFRB variants. We describe clinical characteristics of two patients with a recurrent mosaic PDGFRB p.(Tyr562Cys) variant identified via next-generation sequencing-based genetic testing. We observed intracranial fusiform aneurysm in one patient and found an additional eight patients with aneurysms and phenotypes associated with PDGFRB-activating variants through literature search. The conditions caused by PDGFRB-activating variants share overlapping features including overgrowth, premature aged skin, and vascular malformations including aneurysms. Aneurysms are progressive and can result in morbidities and mortalities in the absence of successful intervention. Germline and/or somatic testing for PDGFRB gene should be obtained when PDGFRB activating variant-related phenotypes are present. Whole-body imaging of the arterial tree and echocardiography are recommended after diagnosis. Repeating the imaging study within a 6- to 12-month period after detection is reasonable. Finally, further evaluation for the effectiveness and safety profile of kinase inhibitors in this patient population is warranted.