Hamid Ikram

BACKGROUND: Newly discovered circulating peptides, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) and adrenomedullin (ADM), were examined for prediction of cardiac function and prognosis and compared with previously reported markers in 121 patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The association between radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and N-BNP at 2 to 4 days (r=-.63, P<.0001) and 3 to 5 months (r=-.58, P<.0001) after infarction was comparable to that for C-terminal BNP and far stronger than for ADM (r=-.26, P<.01), N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (N-ANP), C-terminal ANP, cGMP, or plasma catecholamine concentrations. For prediction of death over 24 months of follow-up, an early postinfarction N-BNP level > or = 160 pmol/L had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of 91%, 72%, 39%, and 97%, respectively, and was superior to any other neurohormone measured and to LVEF. Only 1 of 21 deaths occurred in a patient with an N-BNP level below the group median (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, P<.00001). For prediction of heart failure (left ventricular failure), plasma N-BNP > or = 145 pmol/L had sensitivity (85%) and negative predictive value (91%) comparable to the other cardiac peptides and was superior to ADM, plasma catecholamines, and LVEF. By multivariate analysis, N-BNP but not ADM provided predictive information for death and left ventricular failure independent of patient age, sex, LVEF, levels of other hormones, and previous history of heart failure, myocardial infarction, hypertension, or diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma N-BNP measured 2 to 4 days after myocardial infarction independently predicted left ventricular function and 2-year survival. Stratification of patients into low- and high-risk groups can be facilitated by plasma N-BNP or BNP measurements, and one of these could reasonably be included in the routine clinical workup of patients after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the short- and long-term effects of multiple doses of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan in heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicenter, placebo-controlled, oral, multidose (2.5, 10, 25, and 50 mg losartan once daily) double-blind comparison in patients with symptomatic heart failure and impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction < 40%). Invasive 24-hour hemodynamic assessment was performed after the first dose and after 12 weeks of treatment. Clinical status and tolerability of treatment with losartan over the 12-week period were also evaluated. One hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled, of which 134 met the protocol criterion of baseline pulmonary capillary wedge pressure > or = 13 mm Hg. During short-term administration, systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (largest reduction against placebo of 197 dyne.s-1.cm-5 at 4 hours) and blood pressure fell significantly with 50 mg, lesser decreases were seen with 25 mg, and no discernible effects were seen with 2.5 and 10 mg. After 12 weeks of treatment, similar effects were seen on SVR and blood pressure (maximal fall in SVR against placebo, 318 dyne.s-1.cm-5 at 5 hours with 50 mg). In addition, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure fell with 2.5, 25, and 50 mg (largest reduction against placebo of 6.3 mm Hg at 6 hours with 50 mg), cardiac index rose with 25 and 50 mg, and heart rate was lower with all active treatment groups. Active treatment was well tolerated, and excess cough was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that oral losartan administered to patients with symptomatic heart failure resulted in beneficial hemodynamic effects with short-term administration, with additional beneficial hemodynamic effects seen after 12 weeks of therapy. Clear effects were seen with both 25 and 50 mg, with the greatest effect seen with 50 mg.

BACKGROUND: Plasma neurohormones were analyzed for prediction of adverse outcomes and response to treatment in 415 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction randomly assigned to receive carvedilol or placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), or norepinephrine (NE) levels above the group median were associated with increased mortality rates and heart failure. On multivariate analysis, both BNP and NE interacted with treatment to predict death or heart failure independent of age, New York Heart Association class, and left ventricular ejection fraction. For placebo, supramedian levels of BNP were associated with 3-fold the mortality rate of inframedian levels (20/104; 19% vs 6/99; 6%; P<0.01). For carvedilol, mortality rate was comparable in these 2 subgroups (12/109; 11% vs 8/94; 9%; NS). Corresponding rates for heart failure were 29/104 (28%) versus 3/99 (3%; P<0.001) for placebo and 16/109 (15%) versus 7/94 (7%; NS) for carvedilol. High NE levels did not predict additional benefit from carvedilol, which significantly reduced heart failure admissions only in those with NE levels below the median (13.1% to 4. 0%; P<0.01). In the 23% of the study population with supramedian BNP but inframedian levels of NE, carvedilol reduced hospital admission with heart failure by >90% (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol reduced mortality rates and heart failure in those with higher pretreatment BNP levels but lesser activation of plasma NE. Neurohumoral profiling may guide introduction of beta-blockade in heart failure.