J

Joshua Miller

Mayo Clinic

Publishes on Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments, Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes, Hepatitis C virus research. 26 papers and 2.2k citations.

26Publications
2.2kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

A COMPARISON OF TACROLIMUS (FK506) AND CYCLOSPORINE FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AFTER CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1
John D. Pirsch, Joshua Miller, Mark H. Deierhoi et al.|Transplantation|1997
Cited by 1.1k

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (FK506), a macrolide molecule that potently inhibits the expression of interleukin 2 by T lymphocytes, represents a potential major advance in the management of rejection following solid-organ transplantation. This randomized, open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in patients receiving cadaveric kidney transplants. METHODS: A total of 412 patients were randomized to tacrolimus (n=205) or cyclosporine (n=207) after cadaveric renal transplantation and were followed for 1 year for patient and graft survival and the incidence of acute rejection. RESULTS: One-year patient survival rates were 95.6% for tacrolimus and 96.6% for cyclosporine (P=0.576). Corresponding 1-year graft survival rates were 91.2% and 87.9% (P=0.289). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the tacrolimus group (30.7%) compared with the cyclosporine group (46.4%, P=0.001), which was confirmed by blinded review, and in the use of antilymphocyte therapy for rejection (10.7% and 25.1%, respectively; P<0.001). Impaired renal function, gastrointestinal disorders, and neurological complications were commonly reported in both treatment groups, but tremor and paresthesia were more frequent in the tacrolimus group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 19.9% in the tacrolimus group and 4.0% in the cyclosporine group (P<0.001), and was reversible in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is more effective than cyclosporine in preventing acute rejection in cadaveric renal allograft recipients, and significantly reduces the use of antilymphocyte antibody preparations. Tacrolimus was associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events, which were rarely treatment limiting, and with posttransplant diabetes mellitus, which was reversible in some patients.

Evidence That Tacrolimus Augments the Bioavailability of Mycophenolate Mofetil Through the Inhibition of Mycophenolic Acid Glucuronidation
Keith Zucker, Alexandra Tsaroucha, Les Olson et al.|Therapeutic Drug Monitoring|1999
Cited by 179

We previously reported an unexpected augmentation of mycophenolic acid (MPA) levels (trough and AUC0-12) in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with tacrolimus versus patients receiving the same dose of MMF in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA). This finding was accompanied by a corresponding reduction of the inactive glucuronide metabolite of MPA (MPAG) in patients, suggesting that tacrolimus may effect the conversion of MPA to MPAG by the enzyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT). To investigate this possibility directly, UDPGT was extracted from human liver and kidney tissue and its activity was characterized using MPA as a substrate in vitro, assessing the conversion of MPA to MPAG using analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography. With crude microsomal preparations, amounts of UDPGT at least 100 times higher in specific activity (i.e., units to milligrams of protein) could be extracted per gram of tissue from kidney as opposed to liver. This result did not appear to be related to the coextraction of a liver-specific UDPGT inhibitor because initial enzyme kinetic values (Vmax and km) were identical for kidney and liver extracts, and further purification of the liver enzyme did not enhance activity (as is seen when inhibitors are removed during purification). With further UDPGT purification (approximately 200-fold) from kidney extracts using a combination of ammonium sulfate precipitation, followed by anion exchange, hydroxyapatite, and size exclusion chromatography, the enzyme was more than 80% pure when assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Initial enzyme kinetic analysis of this purified product showed a km value for MPA of 35.4+/-5.7 microg/mL and a Vmax of 2.87+/-0.31 MPAG produced per hour (n = 7). The addition of clinically relevant concentrations of CsA (200-1,000 ng/mL) or tacrolimus (10-25 ng/mL) resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of the UDPGT enzyme by both agents with tacrolimus, which was approximately 60-fold more efficient as an inhibitor. The calculated inhibition constants (KI) of tacrolimus and CsA for the purified UDPGT were 27.3+/-5.6 ng/ml and 2,518+/-1473 ng/ml. respectively. Both agents displayed an inhibition profile characteristic of a competitive inhibitor (substrate) that could be demonstrated in a reciprocal experiment with CsA as a substrate, but not with tacrolimus. This finding suggested that the significantly more efficient inhibition of UDPGT by tacrolimus may occur by a more complicated mechanism that is yet to be determined.

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TACROLIMUS IN COMBINATION WITH MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL (MMF) IN CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1
Joshua Miller, Robert Mendez, John D. Pirsch et al.|Transplantation|2000
Cited by 171

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (FK506) is a safe and effective treatment for the prevention of rejection of renal allografts. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used as adjunct immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the same purpose. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of FK506 and MMF in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: After cadaveric renal transplant, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus in combination with either azathioprine (AZA, n=59), MMF 1 g/day (n=59), or MMF 2 g/day group (n=58). Patients were followed for 1 yr posttransplant for the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: Tacrolimus doses and trough concentrations were similar between treatment groups at all time points; 80% of patients were maintained within a range of 5.0-13.9 ng/ml at 12 months posttransplant. The mean dose of MMF decreased in the 2 g/day group to 1.5 g/day by 6 months posttransplant, primarily due to gastrointestinal GI-related disorders. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 1 year was 32.2%, 32.2%, and 8.6% in the AZA, MMF 1 g/day, and MMF 2 g/day groups, respectively (P<0.01). The use of antilymphocyte antibodies for the treatment of rejection was comparable across treatment groups. The incidence of most adverse events was similar across treatment groups and comparable with previous reports. The overall incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 11.9%, with the lowest rate observed in the MMF 2 g/day group (4.7%), and was reversible in 40% of patients. The incidence of malignancies and opportunistic infections was low and not different across treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus in combination with an initial dose of MMF 2 g/day is a very effective and safe regimen in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients.

Immune Reconstitution/Immunocompetence in Recipients of Kidney Plus Hematopoietic Stem/Facilitating Cell Transplants
Cited by 134

Nineteen subjects have more than 18 months' follow-up in a phase IIb tolerance protocol in HLA-mismatched recipients of living donor kidney plus facilitating cell enriched hematopoietic stem cell allografts (FCRx). Reduced intensity conditioning preceded a kidney allograft, followed the next day by FCRx. Twelve have achieved stable donor chimerism and have been successfully taken off immunosuppression (IS). We prospectively evaluated immune reconstitution and immunocompetence. Return of CD4 and CD8 T central and effector memory cell populations was rapid. T-cell receptor (TCR) Excision Circle analysis showed a significant proportion of chimeric cells produced were being produced de novo. The TCR repertoires posttransplant in chimeric subjects were nearly as diverse as pretransplant donors and recipients, and were comparable to subjects with transient chimerism who underwent autologous reconstitution. Subjects with persistent chimerism developed few serious infections when off IS. The majority of infectious complications occurred while subjects were still on conventional IS. BK viruria and viremia resolved after cessation of IS and no tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus infections occurred. Notably, although 2 of 4 transiently or nonchimeric subjects experienced recurrence of their underlying autoimmune disorders, none of the chimeric subjects have, suggesting that self-tolerance is induced in addition to tolerance to alloantigen. No persistently chimeric subject has developed donor-specific antibody, and renal function has remained within normal limits. Patients were successfully vaccinated per The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation guidelines without loss of chimerism or rejection. Memory for hepatitis vaccination persisted after transplantation. Chimeric subjects generated immune responses to pneumococcal vaccine. These data suggest that immune reconstitution and immunocompetence are maintained in persistently chimeric subjects.