Mary Lin Farrell

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) associated with de novo production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a clinicopathological entity that carries a poor prognosis (acute humoral rejection, AHR). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of AHR in renal allograft recipients, and to further analyze the antibodies involved. METHODS: During a 4-year period, 232 renal transplants (Tx) were performed at our institution. Assays for DSA included T and B cell cytotoxic and/or flow cytometric cross-matches and cytotoxic antibody screens (PRA). C4d complement staining was performed on frozen biopsy tissue. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients (35%) suffered at least one episode of AR within the first 3 months: 51 had steroid-insensitive AR whereas the remaining 30 had steroid-sensitive AR. No DSA were found in patients with steroid-sensitive AR. In contrast, circulating DSA were found in 19/51 patients (37%) with steroid-insensitive AR, and widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries were present in 18 of these 19 (95%). In at least three cases, antibodies were against donor HLA class II antigens. DSA were not found in the remaining 32 patients but C4d staining was positive in 2 of 32. The DSA/C4d positive (n=18) and DSA/C4d negative (n=30) groups differed in pre-Tx PRA levels, percentage of re-Tx patients, refractoriness to antilymphocyte therapy, and outcome. Plasmapheresis and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil rescue reversed rejection in 9 of 10 recipients with refractory AHR. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the patients with steroid-insensitive AR had evidence of AHR, often resistant to antilymphocyte therapy. Most cases (95%) with DSA at the time of rejection had widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries, suggesting a pathogenic role of the circulating alloantibody. Combined DSA testing and C4d staining provides a useful approach for the early diagnosis of AHR, a condition that often necessitates a more intensive therapeutic rescue regimen.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest an association between diabetes mellitus and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Our aim was to determine (1) the prevalence and determinants of new onset posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in HCV (+) liver transplant (OLT) recipients, (2) the temporal relationship between recurrent allograft hepatitis and the onset of PTDM, and (3) the effects of antiviral therapy on glycemic control. METHODS: Between January of 1991 and December of 1998, of 185 OLTs performed in 176 adult patients, 47 HCV (+) cases and 111 HCV (-) controls were analyzed. We reviewed and analyzed the demographics, etiology of liver failure, pretransplant alcohol abuse, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and clinical characteristics of both groups. In HCV (+) patients, the development of recurrent allograft hepatitis and its therapy were also studied in detail. RESULTS: The prevalence of pretransplant diabetes was similar in the two groups, whereas the prevalence of PTDM was significantly higher in HCV (+) than in HCV (-) patients (64% vs. 28%, P=0.0001). By multivariate analysis, HCV infection (hazard ratio 2.5, P=0.001) and methylprednisolone boluses (hazard ratio 1.09 per bolus, P=0.02) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of PTDM. Development of PTDM was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio 3.67, P<0.0001). The cumulative mortality in HCV (+) PTDM (+) versus HCV (+) PTDM (-) patients was 56% vs. 14% (P=0.001). In HCV (+) patients with PTDM, we could identify two groups based on the temporal relationship between the allograft hepatitis and the onset of PTDM: 13 patients developed PTDM either before or in the absence of hepatitis (group A), and 12 concurrently with the diagnosis of hepatitis (group B). In gr. B, 11 of 12 patients received antiviral therapy. Normalization of liver function tests with improvement in viremia was achieved in 4 of 11 patients, who also demonstrated a marked improvement in their glycemic control. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of PTDM in HCV (+) recipients. PTDM after OLT was associated with significantly increased mortality. HCV infection and methylprednisolone boluses were found to be independent risk factors for the development of PTDM. In approximately half of the HCV (+) patients with PTDM, the onset of PTDM was related to the recurrence of allograft hepatitis. Improvement in glycemic control was achieved in the patients who responded to antiviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) is frequently observed in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. Previous retrospective or nonrandomized studies have suggested that intraoperative administration of polyclonal antithymocyte preparations may reduce the incidence of DGF, possibly by decreasing ischemia-reperfusion injury. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study of Thymoglobulin induction therapy in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Between January 2001 and January 2002, 58 adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomized to receive intraoperative or postoperative Thymoglobulin induction therapy. Three to six doses of Thymoglobulin (1 mg/kg/dose) were administered during the first week posttransplant. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus (54 of 58) or cyclosporine A (4 of 58), steroids, and mycophenolate mofetil. DGF was defined by the requirement for hemodialysis within the first week posttransplant. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in recipient demographics, donor age, cold ischemia time, or total number of doses of Thymoglobulin administered. Intraoperative Thymoglobulin administration was associated with significantly less DGF and a lower mean serum creatinine on postoperative days 10 and 14 (P<0.05). Posttransplant length of stay was also significantly shorter for the intraoperative Thymoglobulin patient group. The acute rejection rate was also lower in the intraoperative treatment group but this did not achieve statistical significance. There was no difference in the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that intraoperative Thymoglobulin administration, in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients, is associated with a significant decrease in DGF, better early allograft function in the first month posttransplant, and a decreased posttransplant hospital length of stay.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal allograft rejection associated with the development of donor-specific alloantibody (acute humoral rejection, AHR) typically carries a poor prognosis. The best treatment of this condition remains undefined. METHODS: During a 14-month period, 73 renal transplants were performed. During the first postoperative month, five recipients (6.8%) with AHR were identified. The diagnosis was based on: (1) evidence of severe rejection, resistant to steroid and antilymphocyte therapy; (2) typical pathologic features; and (3) demonstration of donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) in recipient's serum at the time of rejection. Pretransplant donor-specific T- and B-cell cross-matches were negative. RESULTS: Plasma exchange (PE, four to seven treatments per patient) significantly decreased circulating DSA to almost pretransplant levels in four of five patients, and improvement in renal function occurred in all patients. One patient had recurrent renal dysfunction in the setting of an increase in circulating DSA. A second series of five PE treatments decreased DSA and reversed the rejection episode. Rescue therapy with tacrolimus (initial mean dose: 0.14+/-0.32 mg/kg/day) and mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day) was used in five of five and four of five patients, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 19.6+/-5.6 months, patient and allograft survival are 100%. Renal function remains excellent with a mean current serum creatinine of 1.2+/-0.3 mg/dl. (range: 0.9-1.8 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach combining PE and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil rescue has the potential to improve the outcome of AHR.

The effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on patient and allograft survival were determined in 1245 renal transplant recipients from 46 transplant centers. When an antilymphocyte preparation was administered to cadaveric allograft recipients, those at risk for primary CMV had a worse outcome than similar patients treated with prednisone and azathioprine (53.1% alive at 6 months with a functioning allograft vs. 70.8%, P=.05) or patients at risk for reactivation CMV (53.1% vs. 71.1%, P=.035). Patients at risk for reactivation CMV had a better outcome if they recieved an antilymphocyte preparation (71.1% vs. 60.8%, P<.01). The type of immunosuppression had no effect on patients without CMV. Living-related donor transplantation was not significantly influenced by CMV or type of immuno-suppression. We conclude that CMV infection is strongly influenced by the form of immunosuppression employed, and that both are important determinants of the outcome of cadaveric renal transplantation.