Maor Schreiber

To test the hypothesis that calcium antagonists decrease the incidence and severity of delayed graft function, we conducted three separate, prospective, randomized trials. In these trials, we investigated the effects of diltiazem and those of the prostacyclin analogue iloprost. In the first study, 22 control patients and 20 diltiazem patients received grafts perfused with either vehicle or diltiazem 20 mg/liter in the Euro-Collins solution. Subsequently, the diltiazem subjects were given the drug as a bolus of 0.28 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.002 mg/min/kg for the following two days. Thereafter, diltiazem 60 mg was given to the treated subjects orally for up to four years. In the second study, 11 control subjects and 10 diltiazem subjects received the same postoperative regimen, but all grafts were harvested without addition of diltiazem to the perfusion solution. In the third protocol, four groups were studied as follows: 19 control subjects who received no specific treatment, 16 subjects who received diltiazem, 16 subjects who were given iloprost, and 14 subjects who received both iloprost and diltiazem. The donor kidney of treated patients was perfused with either diltiazem, iloprost, or both drugs. Primary graft function occurred more commonly in the groups receiving diltiazem. Further, in the first study the number of hemodialyses per patient was reduced in those patients with delayed graft function. Fewer rejection episodes occurred in patients receiving diltiazem. Plasma levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptors decreased significantly during diltiazem treatment. Moreover, renal biopsies showed less severe signs of Cyclosporin A (CsA) nephrotoxicity in diltiazem-treated patients compared to controls, even though these patients also exhibited higher CsA trough levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) in peritoneal dialysis patients. Seventy-eight patients were randomized to receive EPO and 74 received placebo during the first 12 wk. After this, placebo patients with hematocrit less than 32% entered the EPO maintenance phase along with the initial EPO patients. Hematocrit rose significantly in the EPO group from 23.8 to 32% after 6 wk, and this was sustained at 33.7% at 12 wk. In the placebo group, the prestudy hematocrit was 23.8% as well, and no significant change in hematocrit occurred over 12 wk. Concomitant with the rise in hematocrit, transfusion requirements fell only in the EPO group. Eighty-eight percent of patients receiving EPO had their anemia ameliorated by Week 12 of the study. There was a wide range of dosage requirements during the maintenance phase, ranging from 8,000 U thrice weekly to 4,000 U every other week. Adverse events after EPO were similar to those seen in hemodialysis patients given this agent, with hypertension developing or worsening in 55% of EPO patients during the initial 12 wk of therapy. Blood pressure was more likely to rise in patients with hypertension before receiving EPO. EPO is safe and effective in peritoneal dialysis patients, as it is in hemodialysis patients. Other than a rise in blood pressure, which is manageable with antihypertensives and ultrafiltration with dialysis, no serious side effects are seen. The optimal target hematocrit, effects of anemia improvement on quality of life, and end-organ (heart, brain) effects of anemia improvement in this patient population require further study.

The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue. This is driven in part by the current diversity of methods to manipulate and measure perceptual consciousness. Here, we provide ten recommendations and nine outstanding issues about designing experimental paradigms, analyzing data, and reporting the results of studies on unconscious processing. These were formed through dialogue among a group of researchers representing a range of theoretical backgrounds. We acknowledge that some of these recommendations naturally do not align with some existing approaches and are likely to change following theoretical and methodological development. Nevertheless, we hold that at this stage of the field they are instrumental in evoking a much-needed discussion about the norms of studying unconscious processes and helping researchers make more informed decisions when designing experiments. In the long run, we aim for this paper and future discussions around the outstanding issues to lead to a more convergent corpus of knowledge about the extent - and limits - of unconscious processing.