Protamine: a review of its toxicity.The prospective human studies considered above reveal that in some patients protamine is associated with decreases in SBP and SVR, especially when administered rapidly. Cardiac output increases reflexly, except perhaps in patients with less compliant ventricles, which are more dependent on preload to maintain stroke volume. In the latter, decreases in filling volume associated with protamine can lower CO. Regardless of the rate of administration, protamine does not produce predictable, acute increases in PAP, although increases in PAP may occur during idiosyncratic reactions (see the section on idiosyncratic reactions below). Left atrial or aortic administration of protamine may not confer protection from its hemodynamic or idiosyncratic sequelae (see below). Little evidence exists to conclude that protamine directly depresses contractility of the human heart.
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Aprotinin for Reducing Blood Loss and the Requirement for Donor-Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Repeat Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingBACKGROUND: Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements when administered prophylactically to cardiac surgical patients. To examine the safety and dose-related efficacy of aprotinin, a prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, pump-prime-only aprotinin, or placebo. Drug efficacy was determined by the reduction in donor-blood transfusion up to postoperative day 12 and in postoperative thoracic-drainage volume. The percentage of patients requiring donor-red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusions in the high- and low-dose aprotinin groups was reduced compared with the pump-prime-only and placebo groups (high-dose aprotinin, 54%; low-dose aprotinin, 46%; pump-prime only, 72%; and placebo, 75%; overall P = .001). The number of units of donor RBCs transfused was significantly lower in the aprotinin-treated patients compared with placebo (high-dose aprotinin, 1.6 +/- 0.2 U; low-dose aprotinin, 1.6 +/- 0.3 U; pump-prime-only, 2.5 +/- 0.3 U; and placebo, 3.4 +/- 0.5 U; P = .0001). There was also a significant difference in total blood-product exposures among treatment groups (high-dose aprotinin, 2.2 +/- 0.4 U; low-dose aprotinin, 3.4 +/- 0.9 U; pump-prime-only, 5.1 +/- 0.9 U; placebo, 10.3 +/- 1.4 U). There were no differences among treatment groups for the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that high- and low-dose aprotinin significantly reduces the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in repeat CABG patients without increasing the risk for perioperative MI.
The Dose-Response Relationship of Tranexamic Acid BACKGROUND: Prophylactic administration of the antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid decreases bleeding and transfusions after cardiac operations. However, the best dose of tranexamic acid for this purpose remains unknown. This study explored the dose-response relationship of tranexamic acid for hemostatic efficacy after cardiac operation. METHODS: In prospective, randomized, double-blinded fashion, 148 patients undergoing cardiac operation with extracorporeal circulation were divided into six groups: a placebo group and five groups receiving tranexamic acid in loading doses before incision (range 2.5 to 40 mg.kg-1) and one-tenth the loading dose hourly for 12 h. The mass of blood collected by chest tubes over 12 h represented blood loss. Allogeneic transfusions within 12 h and within 5 d of surgery were tallied. RESULTS: The six groups presented similar demographics. Patients receiving placebo had increased postoperative D-dimer concentration compared to groups receiving tranexamic acid. Patients receiving at least 10 mg.kg-1 tranexamic acid followed by 1 mg.kg-1.h-1 bled significantly less (365, 344, and 369 g.12 h-1, respectively, for those three groups) compared with patients who received placebo (552 g, P < 0.05). Tranexamic dose did not affect transfusions. Only initial hematocrit affected whether a patient received an allogeneic transfusion within 5 days of operation (odds ratio 2.08 for each 3% absolute decrease in hematocrit). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic tranexamic acid, 10 mg.kg-1 followed by 1 mg.kg-1.h-1, decreases bleeding after extracorporeal circulation. Larger doses do not provide additional hemostatic benefit.
ProtamineJan C. Horrow|Anesthesia & Analgesia|1985 Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Address correspondence to Dr. Horrow, Department of Anesthesia, Hahnemann University, Broad and Vine Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19102. The author thanks Ms. Judy Wyman for document preparation and Dr. Jonathan Mark for constructive criticism of the manuscript. Accepted for publication November 1, 1984.
Prophylactic tranexamic acid decreases bleeding after cardiac operationsJan C. Horrow, James M. Hlavacek, Michael D. Strong et al.|Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery|1990