Sharon Soroko

PURPOSE: Sepsis commonly contributes to acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the frequency with which sepsis develops as a complication of AKI and the clinical consequences of this sepsis are unknown. This study examined the incidence of, and outcomes associated with, sepsis developing after AKI. METHODS: We analyzed data from 618 critically ill patients enrolled in a multicenter observational study of AKI (PICARD). Patients were stratified according to their sepsis status and timing of incident sepsis relative to AKI diagnosis. RESULTS: We determined the associations among sepsis, clinical characteristics, provision of dialysis, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay (LOS), comparing outcomes among patients according to their sepsis status. Among the 611 patients with data on sepsis status, 174 (28%) had sepsis before AKI, 194 (32%) remained sepsis-free, and 243 (40%) developed sepsis a median of 5 days after AKI. Mortality rates for patients with sepsis developing after AKI were higher than in sepsis-free patients (44 vs. 21%; p < 0.0001) and similar to patients with sepsis preceding AKI (48 vs. 44%; p = 0.41). Compared with sepsis-free patients, those with sepsis developing after AKI were also more likely to be dialyzed (70 vs. 50%; p < 0.001) and had longer LOS (37 vs. 27 days; p < 0.001). Oliguria, higher fluid accumulation and severity of illness scores, non-surgical procedures after AKI, and provision of dialysis were predictors of sepsis after AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis frequently develops after AKI and portends a poor prognosis, with high mortality rates and relatively long LOS. Future studies should evaluate techniques to monitor for and manage this complication to improve overall prognosis.

Abstract To determine whether a family history of osteoporosis identifies individuals with low bone mineral density (BMD), we studied 1477 white elderly (aged 60–89 years), noninstitutionalized ambulatory men (n = 600) and women (n = 877) from the Rancho Bernardo, California cohort. Family history data on biologic parents and full sisters were obtained by questionnaire. BMD of the lumbar spine and hip was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. After adjustment for age, body mass index, history of cigarette smoking, thiazide use, and estrogen use, men and women with a family history of osteoporosis had lower BMD than those with a negative family history. In men, a positive family history was associated with lower BMD at the hip (p = 0.01), whereas in women a significant association was observed for the spine (p = 0.02). BMD decreased in a stepwise fashion with an increasing number of family members with a history of osteoporosis. Analysis of the effect of parental history of osteoporosis on BMD showed a significant relation between paternal (but not maternal) history and lumbar spine BMD in both sexes and a significant relation between maternal (but not paternal) history and hip BMD only in men. The relative risk of having categoric osteopenia was highest in those whose fathers had a history of osteoporosis (RR 2.16, 95% CI = 1.38–3.37). A similar association was found for subjects with fractures. These results were not explained by differential awareness of family history in individuals with known osteoporosis, because the prevalence of family history was unrelated to personal history of osteoporosis in men and only weakly related in women. The positive predictive value of family history as an indicator of categorically defined low bone density was 22% in men and 24% in women, although in women this value increased to 33% when father's history alone was considered. The negative predictive value of overall family history was 65% in men and 81% in women. Overall, these data suggest that clinicians who ask patients about family history of osteoporosis should ask about both parents.