The COMS Randomized Trial of Iodine 125 Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanoma, III: Initial Mortality FindingsMarie Diener‐West, John D. Earle, Shai Fine et al.|Archives of Ophthalmology|2001 OBJECTIVES: To report initial mortality findings from the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized clinical trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy vs enucleation for treatment of choroidal melanoma. METHODS: Patients were evaluated for eligibility at 43 participating clinical centers in the United States and Canada. Eligible consenting patients were assigned randomly at the time of enrollment to enucleation or 125I brachytherapy. Patients were examined at specified intervals after enrollment for data collection purposes. Findings presented herein are based on data received by September 30, 2000. Data for each patient were analyzed with the treatment group to which the patient was assigned randomly at the time of enrollment. RESULTS: During the 11(1/2)-year accrual period, 1317 patients enrolled; 660 were assigned randomly to enucleation and 657 to 125I brachytherapy. Only 2 patients in the enucleation arm were found to have been misdiagnosed when histopathology was reviewed centrally. All but 17 patients (1.3%) received the assigned treatment. Adherence to the brachytherapy protocol was excellent, with 91% of patients treated per protocol. Based on time since enrollment, 1072 patients (81%) had been followed for mortality for 5 years and 416 (32%) for 10 years. A total of 364 patients had died: 188 (28%) of 660 patients in the enucleation arm and 176 (27%) of 657 patients in the brachytherapy arm. The unadjusted estimated 5-year survival rates were 81% and 82%, respectively; there was no clinically or statistically significant difference in survival rates overall (P =.48, log-rank test). The adjusted estimated risk ratio for 125I brachytherapy vs enucleation was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.22). Five-year rates of death with histopathologically confirmed melanoma metastasis were 11% and 9% following enucleation and brachytherapy, respectively; after adjustment, the estimated risk ratio was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.66-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates following 125I brachytherapy did not differ from mortality rates following enucleation for up to 12 years after treatment of patients with choroidal melanoma who enrolled in this COMS trial. The power of the study was sufficient to indicate that neither treatment is likely to increase or decrease mortality rates by as much as 25% relative to the other.
Prospective Randomized Trial of Low- Versus High-Dose Radiation Therapy in Adults With Supratentorial Low-Grade Glioma: Initial Report of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group StudyEdward Shaw, Robert M. Arusell, B. W. Scheithauer et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|2002 PURPOSE: To compare survival and toxicity in adult patients treated with low-dose (50.4 Gy/28 fractions) versus high-dose (64.8 Gy/36 fractions) localized radiation therapy (RT) for supratentorial low-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and mixed oligoastrocytoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1986 to 1994, 203 eligible/analyzable patients were randomized: 101 to low-dose RT, 102 to high-dose RT. Almost half were younger than 40 years, and 95% had grade 2 tumors. Histologic subtype was astrocytoma (or mixed oligo-astrocytoma with astrocytoma dominant) in 32% of patients and oligodendroglioma (or oligoastrocytoma with oligodendroglioma dominant) in 68%. Tumor diameter was less than 5 cm in 35% of patients, and 41% of tumors showed some degree of contrast enhancement. Extent of resection was gross total in 14% of patients, subtotal in 35%, and biopsy only in 51%. RESULTS: At the time of the present analysis, 83 patients (41%) are dead, and median follow-up is 6.43 years in the 120 who are still alive. Survival at 2 and 5 years is nonsignificantly better with low-dose RT; survival at 2 and 5 years was 94% and 72%, respectively, with low-dose RT and 85% and 64%, respectively, with high-dose RT (log rank P =.48). Multivariate analysis identified histologic subtype, tumor size, and age as the most significant prognostic factors. Survival is significantly better in patients who are younger than 40 years and in patients who have oligodendroglioma or oligo-dominant histology. Grade 3 to 5 radiation neurotoxicity (necrosis) was observed in seven patients, with one fatality in each treatment arm. The 2-year actuarial incidence of grade 3 to 5 radiation necrosis was 2.5% with low-dose RT and 5% with high-dose RT. CONCLUSION: This phase III prospective randomized trial of low- versus high-dose radiation therapy for adults with supratentorial low-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and oligoastrocytoma found somewhat lower survival and slightly higher incidence of radiation necrosis in the high-dose RT arm. The most important prognostic factors for survival are histologic subtype, tumor size, and age. The study design of the ongoing intergroup trial in this population will be discussed.
Development of Metastatic Disease After Enrollment in the COMS Trials for Treatment of Choroidal MelanomaOBJECTIVE: To describe the time between treatment for choroidal melanoma and first diagnosis of metastatic disease, sites of metastasis, treatments for metastasis, and time between diagnosis of metastasis and death. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal follow-up of patients diagnosed with choroidal melanoma who were enrolled in 2 randomized trials conducted by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. METHODS: Systemic and laboratory evaluations were performed during follow-up according to a standard protocol for 2320 patients enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study trials without evidence of melanoma metastasis or other primary cancer at baseline. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-nine patients were diagnosed with at least 1 site of metastasis during follow-up after treatment for choroidal melanoma. Five- and 10-year cumulative metastasis rates were 25% (95% confidence interval, 23%-27%) and 34% (95% confidence interval, 32%-37%), respectively. Liver was the most common site (89%). The death rate following the report of melanoma metastasis was 80% at 1 year (95% confidence interval, 77%-83%) and 92% at 2 years (95% confidence interval, 89%-94%). Overall survival after metastasis did not vary by baseline size of primary tumor nor treatment for metastasis (when known). Long-term survival after diagnosis of metastasis was uncommon; only 8 patients survived 5 or more years. CONCLUSION: Metastasis rate increased significantly with increasing primary tumor dimensions at time of patient enrollment. Prognosis after metastatic disease remains poor. Effective methods are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat metastasis from choroidal melanoma.
Collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS) randomized trial of I-125 brachytherapy for medium choroidal melanoma I. visual acuity after 3 years COMS report no. 16Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage Diffuse Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study 1484Sandra J. Horning, Edie Weller, KyungMann Kim et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|2004 PURPOSE: To compare low-dose (30 Gy) radiotherapy (RT) with observation (OBS) in limited-stage aggressive lymphoma patients achieving complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy, and to measure conversion from partial response (PR) to CR with high-dose (40 Gy) RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1984 to 1992, stage I (with risk factors) and II adults with diffuse aggressive lymphoma in CR after eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) were randomly assigned to 30 Gy involved-field RT or OBS. PR patients received 40 Gy RT. RESULTS: Among 172 CR patients, the 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 73% for low-dose RT versus 56% for OBS (two-sided P = .05). Failure-free survival (two-sided P = .06), and time to progression (two-sided P = .06) also favored RT. Intent-to-treat analyses yielded similar results. No survival differences were observed. Three RT versus 15 OBS patients relapsed in initial disease sites. At 6 years, failure-free survival was 63% in PR patients; conversion to CR did not significantly influence clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: For patients in CR after CHOP, low-dose RT prolonged DFS and provided local control, but no survival benefit was observed. The majority of PR patients were event-free at 6 years despite residual radiographic abnormalities. Future efforts should be directed toward improved imaging and more effective systemic therapies.