Toru Motokura

The establishment of an optimal noninvasive method for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis (IA) is needed to improve the management of this life-threatening infection in patients with hematological disorders, and a number of noninvasive tests for IA that target different fungal components, including galactomannan, (1-->3)-beta-d-glucan (BDG), and Aspergillus DNA, have been developed. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the diagnostic potential of three noninvasive tests for IA that were used in a weekly screening strategy: the double-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for galactomannan (Platelia Aspergillus), a real-time PCR assay for Aspergillus DNA (GeniQ-Asper), and an assay for BDG (beta-glucan Wako). We analyzed 149 consecutive treatment episodes in 96 patients with hematological disorders who were at high risk for IA and diagnosed 9 proven IA cases, 2 probable IA cases, and 13 possible invasive fugal infections. In a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve was greatest for ELISA, using two consecutive positive results (0.97; P = 0.036 for ELISA versus PCR, P = 0.055 for ELISA versus BDG). Based on the ROC curve, the cutoff for the ELISA could be reduced to an optical density index (O.D.I.) of 0.6. With the use of this cutoff for ELISA and cutoffs for PCR and BDG that give a comparable level of specificity, the sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value of the ELISA and the PCR and BDG tests were 1.00/0.93/0.55/1.00, 0.55/0.93/0.40/0.96, and 0.55/0.93/0.40/0.96, respectively. In conclusion, among these weekly screening tests for IA, the double-sandwich ELISA test was the most sensitive at predicting the diagnosis of IA in high-risk patients with hematological disorders, using a reduced cutoff of 0.6 O.D.I.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B (HB) virus (HBV) infection is often reactivated, leading to severe hepatitis and death. Because the actual incidence of such complications is unknown, the authors surveyed hospitals to record the incidence of these complications and to identify clinical parameters that would possibly predict the development of hepatic complications. METHODS: First, 250 hospitals, belonging to the Japanese Society of Clinical Hematology, were surveyed for hematologic patients with chronic hepatitis or those with asymptomatic hepatitis virus infection in whom severe hepatitis related to chemotherapy occurred between 1987 and 1991. Second, 117 hospitals that responded to the first questionnaire were surveyed for HBV carriers without severe hepatitis who were prescribed chemotherapy. RESULTS: One-half the number of patients with severe hepatitis were HBV carriers. The incidence of severe hepatitis (52.7%) and the mortality rate (23.6%) were extremely high in HBV carriers. The incidence of severe hepatitis was significantly higher in patients with chronic hepatitis or those receiving corticosteroids (P < 0.05). The mortality rate was significantly lower in patients who were positive for hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) and negative for the antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe), compared with findings in other patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HBV infection is a major causal agent for severe hepatitis related to chemotherapy in Japanese individuals. Chemotherapy, including corticosteroids, to treat hematologic malignancies should be considered risky in HBV carriers, especially those with chronic hepatitis or serologies negative for HBeAg and positive for anti-HBe.